How to Get Rid of Hemp Borers: Prevention & Removal

Getting rid of hemp borers requires a layered approach because no single tactic eliminates them reliably, and the pesticide options available for hemp are far more limited than for most other crops. The two main borer species that attack hemp in the United States and Europe are the European corn borer and the smaller Eurasian hemp borer, and each does its damage differently. What works against them is a combination of cultural practices like adjusting planting density, monitoring with pheromone traps, applying the narrow range of permitted insecticides at the right time, and selecting resistant plant material when possible.

The Two Borer Species That Matter

Hemp growers deal primarily with two borer insects, and telling them apart matters because their behavior and damage patterns differ. The European corn borer, Ostrinia nubilalis, is the larger of the two. It tunnels into the thicker stems and stalks of hemp, weakening the structural integrity of plants to the point where they can snap and break over. Anyone who has grown corn near hemp fields will recognize this insect; it is one of the most widespread crop pests in temperate agriculture. In hemp, it tends to attack the main stalk, and heavy infestations late in the season can compromise an entire stand.

The Eurasian hemp borer, Grapholita delineana, is a much smaller moth whose larvae bore into stalks as well, but with a twist. Despite its size, this species may actually cause more damage than the European corn borer in certain production areas. It can produce three to four generations per year, which allows populations to build rapidly over a single growing season.1Oxford Academic. Developing Insect Pest Management Systems for Hemp in the United States: A Work in Progress That rapid reproductive rate means a seemingly small early-season presence can escalate into a serious problem by harvest time.

How to Spot Borer Damage

Borer damage can be frustratingly hard to detect early because much of it happens inside the plant. European corn borer larvae chew tunnels through stalks that you may not see from the outside until a plant lodges or breaks during wind. By that point the damage is done. Look for entry holes, frass (sawdust-like insect excrement) pushed out from tunnel openings, and weakened stems that bend or snap when handled.

The Eurasian hemp borer is even sneakier. There is minimal external evidence of stalk tunneling. You might notice a slight swelling of the stalk where the larva is feeding, or “leaf flagging,” where individual leaves adjacent to a wound wilt or discolor while the rest of the plant looks fine. The most devastating damage from this species comes late in the season, when larvae tunnel into buds and consume developing seeds.1Oxford Academic. Developing Insect Pest Management Systems for Hemp in the United States: A Work in Progress Growers focused on CBD flower or seed production should be especially alert to bud destruction during the final weeks before harvest.

For grain and fiber hemp, the yield consequences are measurable. A study of industrial hemp in northern Europe found that European corn borer infestation increased with every observation date through the season until harvest, and seed yield losses reached roughly 120 kg per hectare in a bad year.2Journal of Crop Health. Widespread Occurrence of European Corn Borer (Ostrinia nubilalis) and Damage of Industrial Hemp (Cannabis sativa) Crop in Northern Europe Year-over-year damage also increased, suggesting that once borers establish in a region, they get worse without intervention.

Monitoring With Pheromone Traps

You cannot treat what you have not detected, and pheromone traps are the primary tool for catching borer activity before it becomes visible damage. These traps use synthetic versions of the chemical signals female moths release to attract males. When males show up in the trap, you know adults are flying and egg-laying is imminent or already underway.

For European corn borer, bucket-style traps like the Scentry Heliothis trap have proven more effective than some alternatives. Research in corn (which shares this pest with hemp) found that the Scentry Heliothis trap outperformed the Multi-Pher trap and performed similarly to pheromone-baited water pan traps.3PubMed. Monitoring of the European corn borer (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) in central Maine The same general trap designs, including both Scentry Heliothis and delta-style traps, have been deployed in hemp fields for monitoring lepidopteran pests.4PubMed Central. Bycatch of common pollinators in pheromone baited traps for monitoring corn earworm (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in Missouri Industrial Hemp

Where you place your traps matters. During early moth flights, traps positioned along grassy field borders and the first rows of the crop captured more moths. During peak flights, traps in the middle of the field caught the most. That means a single trap location is not enough; ideally, you want traps at both edges and interior points to catch flight activity across the whole season.3PubMed. Monitoring of the European corn borer (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) in central Maine One honest caveat from the research: pheromone trap captures do not always predict damage levels cleanly. There is a correlation between moth numbers and egg mass counts, but the relationship is loose enough that traps work better as an alert system than as a precise damage forecast.

Cultural Practices That Reduce Borer Pressure

Before you reach for any spray bottle, the cheapest and most effective borer management starts with how you set up your field. Several agronomic decisions made at or before planting have a measurable impact on how badly borers hit your crop.

Planting Density

This is one of the strongest levers available. Research on European corn borer resistance in hemp found that dense plantings dramatically reduced infestation. When hemp was grown at four to five million plants per hectare with narrow row spacing of about 15 cm, infestation rates were at their lowest. In contrast, sparse plantings at around 500,000 plants per hectare with wider 45 cm spacing had the most severe infestations.5Journal of the International Hemp Association. Survey of the VIR Cannabis collection I: Resistance of accessions to corn stem borer (Ostrinia nubilalis Hb.) Dense stands create a canopy that is less attractive to egg-laying moths and more difficult for larvae to navigate. For fiber hemp, this is straightforward to implement since fiber production already calls for tight spacing. For CBD flower production, where plants need more room to develop lateral branching, the trade-off is harder, but even modest increases in plant density can help.

Crop Rotation and Field Sanitation

Both borer species overwinter in plant debris. European corn borer larvae survive the winter inside old stalks left standing in the field. Shredding or plowing under crop residue after harvest destroys overwintering sites and reduces the population that emerges the following spring. If you are growing hemp in rotation with corn, be aware that both crops host the European corn borer. Rotating with a non-host crop like soybeans or small grains breaks the cycle more effectively than alternating between two host crops. Fields surrounded by heavy weed growth, especially grassy borders, can harbor adult moths early in the season, so keeping borders mowed or managed reduces the reservoir of adults waiting to colonize your hemp.

Harvest Timing

Because both borer species escalate their damage as the season progresses, harvesting as early as the crop allows can limit late-season losses. The Eurasian hemp borer in particular does its worst damage to buds and seeds in the final weeks before harvest. If your variety and end-use permit it, getting the crop out of the field a week or two earlier can avoid the peak of that damage window.

Biological and Chemical Treatment Options

When cultural practices are not enough, targeted treatments can knock borer populations down. The challenge is timing: larvae must be exposed to the treatment before they bore into the stalk, because once inside they are protected from contact sprays.

A 2024 field trial on CBD hemp compared several insecticides against a complex of lepidopteran caterpillars, including borers. Three products stood out. Coragen (chlorantraniliprole, a synthetic insecticide), Dipel (a Bacillus thuringiensis or Bt product), and Heligen (a baculovirus-based biopesticide) all produced significantly fewer caterpillars on treated plants compared to untreated controls. The same three treatments also resulted in significantly fewer injured flower buds at harvest.6Arthropod Management Tests. Evaluation of biological and synthetic insecticides for control of Lepidopteran caterpillar complex in CBD hemp, 2024 By contrast, Mustang Maxx (a pyrethroid) did not perform better than leaving the plants untreated.

That pyrethroid failure is worth dwelling on. Pyrethroids are the go-to insecticide in many other crops, but they did not provide meaningful caterpillar control in this trial. The biological options (Dipel and Heligen) performed just as well as the synthetic Coragen, which is encouraging for growers who need to keep their pest management organic-compliant or who are wary of synthetic residues on flower material.

Timing matters enormously. In the trial, applications were made three times over two weeks during flowering, starting when eggs or caterpillars were first spotted on flowers. Spraying before larvae are visible wastes product; spraying too late means they are already inside the stalk or bud. This is where your pheromone trap data pays off: when trap catches spike, scout the plants hard, and treat as soon as you confirm eggs or young larvae on foliage or flower structures.

Why Pesticide Options Are So Limited for Hemp

If you grow corn or cotton, you have a long menu of registered insecticides to choose from. Hemp growers do not, and this is the single biggest frustration in hemp pest management. Pesticide registration for hemp is still catching up to the crop’s rapid expansion across the United States. The regulatory framework, which requires specific crop-label registrations for each pesticide, means that many products proven effective against borers in other crops simply cannot be legally applied to hemp.

Pesticide use has been described as one of the major impediments to hemp pest management in the United States.7Journal of Integrated Pest Management. Arthropod and mollusk pests of hemp, Cannabis sativa (Rosales: Cannabaceae), and their indoor management plan in Florida Chemical management overall is limited, which makes non-chemical strategies like resistant varieties and biological control agents all the more important.8Burleigh Dodds Series in Agricultural Science. Integrated pest management in hemp cultivation Before applying any product, check your state’s department of agriculture for the current list of approved pesticides for hemp. The list varies by state and changes frequently as new labels are granted. Applying a product that is not registered for hemp can result in fines, loss of crop certifications, and, for CBD or smokable flower, contamination issues that destroy the crop’s market value.

Bt products like Dipel generally face fewer regulatory hurdles because they are classified as biopesticides and are widely accepted in organic production. Baculovirus products like Heligen are similarly positioned. Coragen (chlorantraniliprole) has a more favorable toxicological profile than older synthetics but still requires a specific hemp label. Always verify registration status in your state before purchasing.

Selecting Resistant Varieties

Not all hemp genetics are equally attractive to borers. Screening of a large Cannabis germplasm collection found that some accessions had infestation rates as low as zero to about 4.5 percent under European corn borer pressure, while others were heavily attacked.5Journal of the International Hemp Association. Survey of the VIR Cannabis collection I: Resistance of accessions to corn stem borer (Ostrinia nubilalis Hb.) The mechanisms behind this resistance are not fully understood, but likely involve a combination of physical traits (stalk toughness, internode length) and chemical traits (cannabinoid or terpene profiles that deter feeding or egg-laying).

For growers in regions where borers are a known problem, asking your seed supplier about borer performance data is worth the effort. The formal breeding pipeline for borer-resistant commercial hemp varieties is still in its early stages, but universities with hemp research programs are actively working on it. If you are trialing multiple varieties, keeping notes on which ones suffer less stalk damage is useful information that compounds over seasons.

The Push-Pull Concept Applied to Hemp

One emerging strategy borrows from integrated pest management work in other crops: push-pull. The idea uses natural chemical signals to repel pests away from the main crop (the “push”) while simultaneously attracting them toward a sacrificial trap crop planted nearby (the “pull”).9PubMed Central. Integrated pest management: the push-pull approach for controlling insect pests and weeds of cereals, and its potential for other agricultural systems including animal husbandry This approach has been deployed successfully against stem borers in cereal crops in Africa, where companion plants like Napier grass attract borers away from maize.

In hemp, the push-pull concept has not been rigorously validated yet, but the logic transfers. If you have a field border or adjacent plot that could host a trap crop attractive to European corn borer, you might draw egg-laying females away from the main hemp stand. Corn itself, ironically, could serve as the “pull” in some situations, though planting corn next to hemp introduces its own complications, since both are hosts. Researchers are exploring whether specific volatiles from hemp varieties or companion plants could serve as the repellent push component. This is still early-stage work, but for growers willing to experiment with field design, it represents a chemical-free approach that complements other tactics.

Why Economic Thresholds Are Missing and What That Means for You

In most established crops, entomologists have developed economic thresholds: the pest population level at which the cost of treatment equals the value of the crop damage you would prevent. These thresholds tell growers when it makes financial sense to spray and when the damage is manageable enough to leave alone. For hemp borers, those thresholds do not exist yet.8Burleigh Dodds Series in Agricultural Science. Integrated pest management in hemp cultivation

The practical consequence is that you are flying somewhat blind when deciding whether to treat. Without a research-backed number telling you “treat when you find X larvae per plant,” you have to rely on your own scouting observations, the value of your crop (CBD flower commands a much higher per-acre value than fiber hemp, so the break-even point for treatment is very different), and the severity of your local borer history. In high-value CBD flower production, even light borer damage to buds can reduce quality and introduce entry points for mold, making the threshold for action effectively very low. In fiber production, where stalks are processed mechanically and some structural damage is tolerable, you can afford to be more patient.

Until formal thresholds are developed, the best guidance is to scout regularly once pheromone traps show adult flight activity, treat promptly in high-value flower crops when you see eggs or early-instar larvae, and tolerate more damage in lower-value fiber or grain operations where the cost of treatment may not pay for itself.

Indoor and Greenhouse Hemp

Borers are primarily a field pest, but growers in enclosed environments are not entirely immune. Moths can enter greenhouses through vents, open doors, and intake fans. The European corn borer is a strong flier attracted to light, and greenhouse lighting during dusk can pull adults inside. Once a female lays eggs on indoor plants, the larvae have no natural enemies to keep them in check unless you introduce them.

In indoor operations, exclusion is the first line of defense. Fine mesh screening over air intakes and doorways keeps adult moths out. If borers do establish indoors, Bt-based sprays are the safest option for enclosed spaces, since they pose no toxicity risk to workers and leave no problematic residues on flower material. Because indoor environments are controlled, you also have the advantage of being able to inspect every plant closely, which makes early detection far easier than in a ten-acre outdoor field. The downside is that if you miss an infestation, the confined space and consistent temperatures allow borer populations to cycle rapidly without the winter diapause that slows them outdoors.

For indoor growers dealing with any caterpillar pest complex, integrating beneficial insects like parasitoid wasps (Trichogramma species, which parasitize moth eggs) can prevent larvae from ever hatching. These biocontrol agents are commercially available, ship as cards or sachets of parasitized eggs, and are released directly onto the crop canopy. They work best as a preventive measure started before you see damage, because once larvae are inside the stalk, a parasitoid that attacks eggs can no longer reach them.

Nicole Ford

Nicole Ford is a pest management scout at an integrated plant health service in Grand Rapids, Michigan. Each growing season, she monitors commercial nurseries and residential landscapes to detect destructive insects and protect beneficial species. Ford received a BS in entomology from the University of Maryland, College Park, and maintains a state commercial pesticide applicator license. Alongside her diagnostic inspections across local properties, she contributes regular articles on plant protection to Biology Insights.