Why Do Scientists Question if Cats Are Fully Domesticated?

Many consider cats fully domesticated companions, integrating seamlessly into human households. Despite this common perception, some scientists question the extent of feline domestication. This debate stems from unique aspects of cat behavior, genetics, and their historical interaction with humans. Researchers examine these traits to understand why domestic cats may not fit the traditional definition of a fully domesticated species.

What Domestication Entails

Domestication is a multi-generational process where humans influence a species’ care and reproduction to secure a predictable resource. It differs from taming, which is an individual animal’s conditioned behavioral modification to tolerate human presence. True domestication involves permanent genetic modifications, leading to an inherited predisposition toward humans. Over thousands of years, domesticated species undergo changes in morphology, reproductive patterns, and behavior, such as reduced fear responses. Humans control breeding, selecting for desirable traits over successive generations.

The Cat’s Unique Path to Partnership

The association between cats and humans began around 9,000 to 10,000 years ago, coinciding with the rise of agriculture in the Near East. Unlike most other domesticated animals, cats largely self-domesticated. Wildcats, particularly the African wildcat (Felis silvestris lybica), were drawn to human settlements by rodents near grain stores. This created a commensal relationship where cats benefited from food, and humans benefited from pest control. Cats less fearful of humans thrived, leading to genetic changes related to reward-seeking behavior and reduced fear.

Enduring Wild Instincts and Traits

Despite their long association with humans, domestic cats retain much of their wild ancestry. Their strong predatory instincts are a primary example; cats often hunt even when not hungry, driven by innate behaviors like stalking, chasing, and pouncing. This contrasts with many other domesticated species where such instincts have been significantly reduced through selective breeding. Cats also exhibit independence and an often solitary nature, especially compared to social pack animals. They can revert to a feral state quickly, demonstrating an ability to survive without human intervention, unlike most other domesticated animals.

Genetic studies support limited domestication, showing domestic cats have fewer genetic differences from wild counterparts than many other domesticated species. While some genetic changes linked to docility and memory have been identified, the overall genetic divergence is modest. Morphological changes are also less pronounced than in other domesticated animals, largely limited to size reduction and coat color variations. This limited change reflects a less intensive human-directed breeding history.

Why Cats Differ from Other Domesticated Animals

The degree of domestication in cats appears less profound when compared to species like dogs. Dogs, domesticated much earlier (15,000-30,000 years ago), exhibit more significant morphological and behavioral shifts from their wolf ancestors. Dogs display greater reliance on human social cues and underwent extensive selective breeding for diverse traits, leading to hundreds of distinct breeds. In contrast, cats have far fewer genetically distinct breeds, and their physical appearance largely remains similar to wildcats.

Unlike dogs, which often struggle to survive if released into the wild, many domestic cats can adapt and thrive independently. This self-sufficiency and minor genetic and behavioral adaptations highlight why some scientists characterize cats as “semi-domesticated.” The historical context of their integration with humans, driven by mutual benefit rather than direct human control over breeding, explains these differences in the extent of their domestication.