Why Can’t You Tickle Yourself? The Science Behind It
The inability to tickle yourself reveals how the brain distinguishes self-touch from external touch, canceling the sensation by predicting your own movements.
The inability to tickle yourself reveals how the brain distinguishes self-touch from external touch, canceling the sensation by predicting your own movements.
The sensation of being tickled is understood through two distinct phenomena. One type, known as knismesis, is a light, itchy sensation caused by a gentle touch, like a feather brushing the skin. The other, gargalesis, involves more intense, repeated pressure on sensitive areas and is the type that results in laughter. While it’s possible to evoke knismesis on your own, the laughter-inducing gargalesis is nearly impossible to self-inflict, raising the question: why can’t you tickle yourself?
The primary reason you cannot tickle yourself lies within the predictive power of your brain, specifically a region called the cerebellum. Located at the back of the skull, the cerebellum coordinates voluntary movements and also predicts the sensory outcomes of those movements. When you decide to move your fingers to tickle your own ribs, your brain generates a signal known as a corollary discharge. This signal acts as an internal memo, sent ahead of the actual movement.
This advance warning is sent to other sensory areas of the brain, telling them what to expect. The corollary discharge informs the somatosensory cortex—the part of the brain that processes touch—about the impending sensation from your own fingers. Because the touch is fully anticipated, the brain effectively dampens the sensory response. This process of sensory attenuation means the sensation is perceived as far less intense than if it came from an external source.
This neural mechanism applies to all self-produced sensations, which is why the touch of your own hand on your arm feels different from someone else’s. The brain’s ability to distinguish between self-produced and external sensations prevents us from being overwhelmed by feedback from our own bodies. For the specific act of tickling, this predictive dampening is so effective that it cancels out the qualities required to trigger a laugh.
The laughter-inducing form of tickling, gargalesis, is dependent on the element of surprise. Because your brain successfully predicts the precise timing, location, and pressure of your own touch, the component of unpredictability is removed. The sensory information received by your brain matches the forecast sent by the cerebellum, leading to a muted and non-ticklish experience.
Contrast this with the experience of being tickled by another person. Even if you know it’s coming, you cannot predict the exact moment their fingers will make contact or the precise pattern of their movements. This external touch is registered by the brain as unexpected sensory information. Without a matching corollary discharge to dampen the input, the somatosensory cortex processes the signals with full intensity, provoking involuntary laughter.
Experiments using robotic arms to tickle participants have demonstrated this. When there is a slight delay between the participant’s own movement and the robot’s action, the sensation becomes more ticklish. The delay introduces a degree of unpredictability, preventing the brain’s sensory cancellation from working perfectly and allowing the ticklish feeling to emerge.
Evolutionary theories suggest that ticklishness, particularly gargalesis, may serve social and protective functions. The laughter and positive feelings often associated with being tickled can act as a tool for social bonding, especially between a parent and child or during playful interactions among peers.
This type of physical play helps to build and strengthen social relationships from a very early age. The laughter that accompanies tickling is not the same as the laughter that comes from hearing a joke; it is a more reflexive, instinctual reaction. This suggests that tickling may be a primitive form of communication that fosters connection and positive emotional states between individuals, reinforcing bonds through shared physical experience.
Another perspective is that ticklishness evolved as a defense mechanism. The most ticklish parts of the human body, such as the ribs, stomach, and neck, are also some of the most physically vulnerable. The involuntary squirming and laughter prompted by being tickled in these areas may be a built-in reflex that trains individuals, especially children, to protect these sensitive spots from potential harm. This playful “defense training” could teach us to instinctively shield vital areas of our bodies when approached.