Which Fungus Affects the American Chestnut?

The American Chestnut (Castanea dentata) once reigned supreme in the Eastern North American forest canopy. Before the 20th century, this species was one of the most widespread and ecologically significant hardwood trees, stretching across 29 states and into Canada. Its timber was prized for its straight grain and exceptional rot-resistance. Its reliable annual nut crop provided abundant food for wildlife and people. However, this foundational species was nearly eliminated by a foreign plant disease, transforming it from a towering giant to a functionally extinct shrub. This ecological disaster prompted decades of scientific investigation to understand the cause of its demise and explore possibilities for its eventual return.

Identifying the Pathogen and the Disease

The agent responsible for the American Chestnut’s destruction is the filamentous fungus Cryphonectria parasitica. The devastating disease it causes is known as Chestnut Blight, named for the rapid wilting and death it inflicts on the tree’s above-ground parts. This pathogen is not native to North America; it was introduced accidentally from East Asia, likely on imported nursery stock of less susceptible Chinese and Japanese chestnut species. Since the American Chestnut had no co-evolved defenses against this foreign invader, the fungus spread with lethal efficiency across the entire eastern woodland.

Mechanism of Infection and Devastation

The fungus begins its attack when its spores land on an open wound or crack in the bark. Once established, Cryphonectria parasitica rapidly colonizes the inner bark and the cambium, the layer of cells responsible for the tree’s growth. The pathogen produces toxins, such as oxalic acid, which kill the surrounding living cells. This activity results in the formation of a canker, a sunken, reddish-brown lesion visible on the bark surface.

These cankers expand, spreading fungal mycelium beneath the bark in fan-like patterns. As the lesion grows, it eventually encircles the branch or trunk in a process called girdling. This physical constriction severs the vascular system, including the phloem and xylem tissues that transport sugars and water. With the flow of nutrients and moisture blocked, all parts of the tree above the girdled section quickly starve and die, resulting in characteristic wilting and browning of the leaves.

The fungus then produces characteristic orange-yellow fruiting bodies, called pycnidia and perithecia, on the canker surface. Following rainfall, these structures ooze or eject millions of spores, which are carried by wind, rain, or animals to new infection sites. Infected saplings can succumb to the disease in less than a year, while mature trees may take several years to be killed by the cankers’ expansion.

The Ecological and Historical Impact

The blight was first observed in New York City in 1904, spreading rapidly across the American Chestnut’s native range. Within forty years, the fungus had devastated an estimated 3.5 billion trees throughout the eastern forest. This epidemic removed the species from its position as a dominant canopy tree, fundamentally transforming the makeup of the hardwood forest.

The tree loss was staggering, with the blight advancing across the landscape at a rate of fifty miles per year. By 1950, the American Chestnut, which constituted up to a quarter of the total biomass in some regions, was reduced to a threatened species. This widespread die-off forced a rapid succession of other species, such as oaks, hickories, and maples, to fill the void in the forest canopy.

The loss of the American Chestnut had profound consequences for the forest ecosystem. The reliable annual mast crop was a major food source for fauna, especially deer, bears, and small rodents. While oak and hickory became more prominent, their sporadic nut production led to less predictable food supplies. The wood industry also lost a highly valued, rot-resistant timber resource used extensively for construction, furniture, and utility poles.

While the disease kills the trunk and branches, the root systems often survive and sprout. This regenerative capacity means the species is not numerically extinct, but functionally so, relegated to the forest understory. The sprouts grow vigorously for a few years, but as the bark matures, the fungus inevitably reinfects the stem and kills the young tree. This cycle of growth and death prevents the tree from reaching sexual maturity and producing nuts.

Current Efforts to Restore the American Chestnut

Researchers pursue several scientific strategies aimed at restoring the American Chestnut to its former habitat. One primary approach involves a traditional plant breeding technique called backcrossing. This method begins by crossing the susceptible American Chestnut with the blight-resistant Chinese Chestnut (Castanea mollissima) to introduce resistance genes.

The resulting hybrid offspring are then repeatedly backcrossed with pure American Chestnut trees for several generations. The goal is to retain the blight resistance trait while diluting the Chinese Chestnut’s non-native characteristics. Modern breeding programs now produce trees that are approximately 94 to 96 percent American Chestnut. These efforts aim for a tree that is genetically American but biologically resistant to the fungus, requiring rigorous screening and testing of thousands of seedlings.

Biological control is another strategy, focusing on a phenomenon known as hypovirulence. Researchers found that some strains of Cryphonectria parasitica are naturally infected with a mycovirus, which substantially weakens the fungus. This viral infection prevents the fungus from forming deep, girdling cankers, often allowing the tree to produce callus tissue and heal over the lesion.

Hypovirulence has been successfully observed in Europe, allowing European Chestnut populations to recover from the blight through natural spread. In North America, the approach is complicated by the greater genetic diversity of the fungus, which restricts the virus’s spread between fungal strains. While hypovirulent strains can be deliberately introduced to save an individual tree, scaling this biological control method to an entire forest ecosystem remains a significant challenge.