What Is the MEWS Score and How Is It Calculated?

The Modified Early Warning Score (MEWS) is a standardized physiological scoring system used in hospital settings to quickly identify patients whose health condition may be worsening. This scoring tool aggregates routine measurements into a single number, helping healthcare teams recognize subtle changes in a patient’s status, often before severe deterioration becomes obvious. It provides a consistent, objective framework for monitoring patients and communicating their level of risk. By tracking these changes over time, the MEWS system allows for earlier intervention, which can potentially prevent serious adverse events like unexpected admission to an Intensive Care Unit (ICU) or cardiac arrest.

The Measured Physiological Parameters

The MEWS calculation relies on the assessment of six core physiological metrics routinely measured at the patient’s bedside: respiratory rate, heart rate, systolic blood pressure, body temperature, level of consciousness, and oxygen saturation or the use of supplemental oxygen. These specific signs are chosen because changes in one or more often precede a significant clinical decline by several hours, providing an opportunity for timely intervention.

Respiratory rate is a primary indicator of a patient’s overall well-being, reflecting lung function, cardiovascular status, and metabolic status. Heart rate and systolic blood pressure provide information about the circulatory system, checking the heart’s pumping function and the body’s perfusion. Body temperature is monitored primarily as an indicator of infection or severe metabolic derangement.

The level of consciousness is assessed using the AVPU scale, which categorizes the patient as Alert, responsive to Voice, responsive to Pain, or Unresponsive. The inclusion of oxygen saturation, a measure of the oxygen carried by the blood, along with the requirement for supplemental oxygen, helps to gauge the severity of respiratory compromise.

Calculating and Interpreting the Score

The core mechanism of the MEWS involves assigning a numerical value to each physiological parameter based on how far the measurement deviates from the established normal range. Points are assigned on a four-tiered scale (0, 1, 2, or 3), with higher scores indicating greater physiological abnormality. A score of zero is given when a patient’s vital sign is within the optimal range, while a score of three is reserved for measurements that fall into ranges considered immediately life-threatening.

For example, a respiratory rate between nine and fourteen breaths per minute receives a score of zero, while a rate of thirty or more breaths per minute is assigned a score of three. The final MEWS is the sum of the points from all the measured parameters, resulting in a single composite score that can range from zero to a maximum of 14.

The total score serves as a concise indicator of the patient’s overall physiological risk. A score of 0 or 1 generally signifies a low-risk patient who requires routine monitoring. Conversely, a score of 5 or greater is statistically linked to a significantly increased likelihood of death or the need for transfer to a higher level of care, like the ICU. A score of 3 in any single parameter is often enough to trigger an immediate clinical response, even if the total score is low.

Clinical Action Based on Score

The MEWS functions as a “track and trigger” system, where a rising score automatically initiates a standardized, tiered protocol of clinical escalation. A low score (0 to 1) requires no immediate action beyond standard, scheduled vital sign checks by the nursing staff.

As the score increases to an intermediate level (typically 2 to 3), the protocol calls for increased surveillance, such as more frequent vital sign checks, often every two hours. For these intermediate scores, the nurse will typically review the patient’s condition with a charge nurse or team leader and consider notifying the medical provider during routine rounds.

If the score reaches a threshold of 4 or 5, or if a single parameter scores 3, the response is escalated significantly to ensure timely intervention. This requires immediate notification of the medical team and a more urgent review by a ward doctor or rapid response team.

High scores, often 7 or greater, necessitate a rapid response activation or Medical Emergency Team (MET) call. This brings a specialized team of clinicians to the bedside for immediate assessment and stabilization. Monitoring frequency is increased to every 15 to 30 minutes, and the patient may be transferred to a higher-acuity unit.