What Genes Cause ALS? The Genetics of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a progressive neurodegenerative condition characterized by the selective death of motor neurons. These specialized nerve cells in the brain and spinal cord control voluntary muscle movement. This degeneration leads to muscle weakness, atrophy, and eventual paralysis, including the muscles needed for breathing. While the majority of cases occur without a clear cause, the discovery of specific disease-associated genes has fundamentally shifted the understanding of this disorder. Investigating the genetic underpinnings provides insights into the disease mechanism and targets for developing new treatments.

Distinguishing Sporadic and Familial ALS

ALS is broadly classified into two categories based on family history, though both forms are clinically similar in presentation. Sporadic ALS (SALS) is the most common form, accounting for approximately 90% to 95% of all diagnoses. Individuals with SALS do not have a known family history, and their condition is thought to arise from a complex interplay of genetic susceptibility and environmental factors.

Familial ALS (FALS) makes up about 5% to 10% of diagnoses. FALS is defined by having at least one other relative diagnosed with ALS, indicating a clear inherited pattern, most often following an autosomal dominant inheritance. Researchers have found that even some SALS cases harbor mutations in the same genes identified in FALS, suggesting that the underlying molecular pathways of the disease are often shared.

Key Genes Implicated in ALS

Genetic research has identified numerous genes associated with ALS, with a few major players responsible for the majority of known inherited cases. The C9orf72 gene is the most frequent genetic cause, accounting for 25% to 40% of FALS cases and 4% to 10% of SALS cases in populations of European descent. The pathogenic mechanism involves a massive expansion of a GGGGCC hexanucleotide repeat sequence within a non-coding region of the gene.

The SOD1 gene was the first ALS-associated gene to be identified in 1993. Mutations in SOD1 are the second most common genetic cause of FALS (10% to 20%) and are found in about 1% to 2% of SALS cases. The gene provides instructions for the enzyme superoxide dismutase 1, which normally helps break down toxic oxygen byproducts in cells.

The TARDBP gene codes for the protein TDP-43. While mutations account for a small fraction of FALS (3% to 5%), abnormal clumping of the TDP-43 protein is a neuropathological feature present in over 95% of all SALS cases. TDP-43 is primarily involved in processing messenger RNA.

The FUS gene codes for the Fused in Sarcoma protein, another significant RNA-binding protein linked to ALS. FUS mutations are responsible for 4% to 6% of FALS cases and are associated with aggressive, early-onset forms of the disease. These four genes are the focus of diagnostic testing:

  • C9orf72
  • SOD1
  • TARDBP
  • FUS

The Cellular Impact of Genetic Mutations

ALS-associated gene mutations ultimately lead to the death of motor neurons by disrupting multiple essential cellular processes. A common theme is the concept of a toxic gain of function, where the mutated protein actively acquires a new, damaging property. For example, the mutated SOD1 protein misfolds and aggregates, becoming toxic to the cell.

The C9orf72 hexanucleotide repeat expansion causes toxicity through two main gain-of-function mechanisms. The expanded RNA sequence can sequester other necessary RNA-binding proteins, and it can be translated into toxic dipeptide repeat proteins (DPRs) that accumulate in the cell. This toxic accumulation of aberrant proteins is a hallmark of the disease and directly interferes with the cell’s internal machinery.

When proteins like TDP-43 and FUS are mutated, they often move out of the cell nucleus, where they normally process RNA, and clump together in the cytoplasm. This mislocalization and aggregation lead to a disruption in RNA metabolism and splicing. Furthermore, the accumulation of these faulty proteins impairs critical cellular infrastructure, including mitochondrial function and the transport of materials within the long axons of motor neurons. These combined cellular stressors overwhelm the neuron’s protective mechanisms, eventually leading to its demise.

Genetic Testing and Counseling

The increased understanding of ALS genetics has made genetic testing an increasingly relevant part of the diagnostic and treatment landscape. Consensus guidelines now recommend that all persons with ALS be offered comprehensive genetic testing, even if they do not have a known family history. This testing typically involves an analysis of the most common genes, including C9orf72, SOD1, FUS, and TARDBP.

Identifying a specific gene mutation can provide patients with access to gene-targeted therapies, such as the medication approved for SOD1-related ALS, and eligibility for specific clinical trials.

Genetic counseling provides a detailed explanation of the test results and their implications for the patient and their family. Counselors help interpret the specific inheritance pattern, such as the 50% chance of inheriting an autosomal dominant mutation, and discuss the concept of variable penetrance, where inheriting the mutation does not guarantee developing the disease. Counseling also addresses the complex ethical and emotional considerations of predictive testing for asymptomatic relatives, helping them make informed decisions about whether to learn their own risk status.

Current State of ALS Genetics

Genetic discoveries have provided profound insight into the mechanisms driving motor neuron death in ALS, establishing a clear link between gene mutations and cellular dysfunction. The disease remains complex, however, as the majority of cases occur without a direct inherited cause. Genetic studies have illuminated common pathways of protein aggregation and cellular stress that are active in both the familial and sporadic forms of the condition.

The ongoing identification of new ALS-associated genes continues to build a more complete picture of the disease’s biological complexity. By understanding how these genetic variants initiate a cascade of toxicity, researchers are better positioned to develop targeted therapies aimed at intercepting the disease process at its earliest stages. This genetic focus offers a promising path toward precision medicine.