Legal cases involving public figures often draw significant attention. A recent example involved the Kardashian family, where the legal term “bench” became central to understanding the proceedings.
Understanding the Legal Term “Bench”
In a legal context, “the bench” refers to the judge or the judiciary collectively. This term signifies the authority and decisions emanating from a judge or a panel of judges.
Actions or rulings made by a judge are often described as coming “from the bench,” emphasizing their judicial origin. This can include issuing verdicts, sanctions, or other formal directives. The term “full bench” is used when all judges of a specific court sit together to hear a case, also known as en banc.
The Blac Chyna Defamation Trial
The specific legal event that brought the term “bench” into widespread discussion in relation to the Kardashians was the defamation trial involving Angela White, known professionally as Blac Chyna. In 2017, Blac Chyna filed a lawsuit against several members of the Kardashian-Jenner family: Kris Jenner, Kim Kardashian, Khloé Kardashian, and Kylie Jenner.
The lawsuit alleged defamation and intentional interference with contract, specifically claiming that the family conspired to have her reality television show, “Rob & Chyna,” canceled. Blac Chyna sought over $100 million in damages for alleged lost earnings and future opportunities. The high-profile nature of the individuals involved ensured the trial garnered significant public and media attention.
Key Judicial Rulings and “Benching” Actions
During the Blac Chyna defamation trial, Judge Gregory W. Alarcon made several significant rulings. A notable action involved the judge issuing directed verdicts on certain claims. A directed verdict is a ruling by a judge that removes a claim from the jury’s consideration due to insufficient evidence presented by the plaintiff.
Specifically, Judge Alarcon dismissed the defamation claim against Kim Kardashian, ruling that Blac Chyna’s legal team did not provide sufficient evidence. The judge also ruled that there was no evidence that Kim Kardashian took a “responsible part” in publishing the alleged defamatory statements.
Impact and Aftermath
Following the judicial rulings, the jury continued deliberations on the remaining claims against Kris Jenner, Khloé Kardashian, and Kylie Jenner. Ultimately, the jury delivered a sweeping win for the Kardashian-Jenner family, finding that none of the members defamed Blac Chyna nor interfered with her contract to cause the cancellation of her reality show.
As a result of the verdict, Blac Chyna was awarded no monetary damages. The outcome solidified the family’s position in the legal dispute. Blac Chyna’s legal team indicated they planned to appeal the verdict.