What Does a Nuclear Heart Test Show?

A nuclear heart test, formally known as Myocardial Perfusion Imaging (MPI) or a nuclear stress test, is a non-invasive procedure used to evaluate the function and blood supply of the heart muscle. This imaging technique employs a radiotracer, a radioactive material injected into the bloodstream. The test creates detailed pictures of the heart to assess its health and identify compromised areas, helping cardiologists diagnose symptoms like chest pain or shortness of breath.

How the Nuclear Heart Test Works

The procedure uses a radiopharmaceutical tracer, a substance tagged with a low-level radioactive isotope, which is introduced into a vein. This tracer travels through the bloodstream and is absorbed by healthy heart muscle cells in proportion to the blood flow they receive. The amount of tracer taken up by the tissue directly reflects the regional blood supply within the heart.

A specialized scanning device, typically a Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT) or Positron Emission Tomography (PET) camera, detects the energy emitted by the tracer. This camera rotates around the patient’s chest to capture three-dimensional data, which is processed by a computer to construct detailed images. Areas with greater blood flow appear brighter on the scan.

The full test involves obtaining images during two phases: rest and stress. The rest phase establishes the heart’s baseline blood flow. The stress phase, achieved either through exercise or medication, increases the heart’s workload and blood flow requirements. Comparing the images allows physicians to detect differences in blood supply that only become apparent under exertion.

What the Test Measures: Blood Flow and Muscle Viability

The nuclear heart test measures two things: myocardial perfusion and muscle viability. Perfusion refers to the flow of blood through the coronary arteries into the heart muscle. A healthy heart shows a uniform distribution of the radiotracer, indicating adequate blood delivery across all segments.

Areas with reduced blood flow show less tracer uptake, appearing as “cold” spots on the images. The severity and location of these defects pinpoint where the coronary arteries may be narrowed. This concentration difference evaluates whether the blood supply is sufficient to meet the muscle’s metabolic needs.

The test also assesses muscle viability, which is the health status of the heart tissue. It determines if a section of the heart muscle is permanently damaged or merely starved of blood but still alive. Permanently damaged tissue, such as scar tissue from a prior heart attack, will not absorb the tracer.

This differentiation is crucial, as muscle that is alive but under-perfused (“hibernating myocardium”) may regain function if its blood supply is restored. Tissue showing a fixed defect (no tracer uptake in both rest and stress images) is typically non-viable scar tissue. The test helps guide decisions on whether a revascularization procedure, such as a stent or bypass surgery, could be beneficial.

Translating Test Results into Clinical Meaning

Comparing the rest and stress images provides the clinical meaning used to diagnose coronary artery disease (CAD). When a defect appears during the stress phase but improves significantly during the rest phase, it indicates reversible ischemia. This means the heart muscle has sufficient blood flow at rest but is deprived of blood when oxygen demand increases, suggesting a flow-limiting blockage.

Conversely, a fixed defect shows poor tracer uptake in both the stress and rest images, signifying a prior myocardial infarction (heart attack). This pattern confirms the presence of non-viable scar tissue that has permanently lost its ability to function. Identifying the specific coronary artery territory associated with the defect helps localize the disease.

The size and severity of detected perfusion defects are used for risk stratification. A larger area of reversible ischemia is associated with a higher risk of future cardiac events. This elevated risk level often prompts a cardiologist to recommend aggressive treatment, which may include interventions like angioplasty or coronary artery bypass grafting. The test serves not only as a diagnostic tool but also as a guide for determining the urgency and type of subsequent medical management.