What Do Dentists Use to Numb Gums and Teeth?

Dentists rely primarily on local anesthetics, drugs that temporarily block nerve signals in a specific area so you feel no pain during a procedure. The workhorse agent in most dental offices today is lidocaine, though several related drugs are also in routine use. Numbing typically happens in two stages: a topical gel or cream applied to the gum surface, followed by an injection that delivers the anesthetic deeper into the tissue near the relevant nerves. But those basics only scratch the surface of what is actually happening in your mouth and what options your dentist has at their disposal.

The First Layer: Topical Anesthetics

Before the needle ever comes out, most dentists dab a numbing gel or paste onto the gum tissue at the injection site. These topical anesthetics cause a superficial loss of pain sensation on direct contact with the mucous membrane, which takes the edge off the needle prick that follows.1PubMed Central. Topical anesthesia The active ingredient in most of these products is either benzocaine or lidocaine, and they come in gels, creams, solutions, and sprays.2International Journal of Life Science and Pharma Research. Non-Injectable Eutectic Mixture of Local Anesthesia and Its Implementation in Dentistry – A Comprehensive Review You may have tasted the slightly bitter, cherry-flavored gel your dentist rubbed on with a cotton swab; that is almost always one of these two drugs.

A newer topical formulation called EMLA (a eutectic mixture of lidocaine and prilocaine) has gained some traction in dental offices because it penetrates tissue somewhat more effectively than standard gels.2International Journal of Life Science and Pharma Research. Non-Injectable Eutectic Mixture of Local Anesthesia and Its Implementation in Dentistry – A Comprehensive Review Topical anesthetics alone are not strong enough to numb a tooth for drilling or extraction, though. Their main job is to make the injection that follows more comfortable.

Injectable Local Anesthetics

The injection is where the real numbing happens. Local anesthetics work by blocking sodium channels on nerve fibers, which prevents the nerve from firing a pain signal to your brain. The effect is temporary and confined to the area near the injection, which is why you can be wide awake and alert while feeling absolutely nothing in one section of your mouth.

Several drugs are commonly used, and they all belong to one chemical family called amide local anesthetics. The most common include:

  • Lidocaine: The most widely used dental anesthetic worldwide. It typically comes paired with epinephrine and provides reliable numbness for roughly an hour of working time on the tooth itself.
  • Articaine: Increasingly popular because it diffuses through bone tissue well, making it effective for procedures on both upper and lower teeth.
  • Mepivacaine: Often used without epinephrine, which makes it a good choice when a shorter duration of numbness is preferred or when epinephrine needs to be avoided.
  • Bupivacaine: A longer-acting option sometimes chosen for surgical procedures where extended post-operative pain control is helpful.
  • Prilocaine: Another option that can be used with or without a vasoconstrictor, though it carries a small risk of a blood condition called methemoglobinemia at high doses.

These drugs were developed over decades of research. Cocaine was actually the first local anesthetic used clinically, starting in 1884 when an Austrian physician named Koller used it during eye surgery.3PubMed. From cocaine to ropivacaine: the history of local anesthetic drugs Cocaine’s serious toxicity and addictive properties drove chemists to develop safer alternatives, leading to the synthesis of procaine, then lidocaine in the 1940s, and eventually the modern amide anesthetics used today.4PubMed. The history of local anesthesia

Why Epinephrine Gets Added to the Mix

If you have ever noticed your heart race slightly after a dental injection, epinephrine is the reason. Most dental anesthetic cartridges contain a small amount of epinephrine (also known as adrenaline), which acts as a vasoconstrictor. It narrows the blood vessels at the injection site, and this serves two purposes: it keeps the anesthetic concentrated in the area longer (extending the duration of numbness), and it reduces bleeding during the procedure.

Epinephrine is one of the most widely used vasoconstrictors in dental treatment.5PubMed Central. Cardiovascular effect of epinephrine in endodontic microsurgery: a review The doses used are tiny, but they can still cause a brief increase in heart rate and a sensation of nervousness. For most healthy people, this is harmless and passes quickly. For patients with certain cardiovascular conditions, however, dentists may choose a formulation without epinephrine or with a different vasoconstrictor, adjusting the plan based on the patient’s medical history.

How Injection Technique Affects Your Experience

The same drug can feel very different depending on how and where the dentist delivers it. Two main injection approaches cover the vast majority of dental procedures.

For upper teeth, dentists usually use what is called local infiltration: they inject the anesthetic into the gum tissue near the tooth being treated. The solution soaks through the relatively thin bone of the upper jaw and reaches the nerve endings around the tooth root. This is straightforward and works well for most upper teeth.

Lower back teeth are trickier. The lower jawbone is much thicker and denser, which traditionally meant the anesthetic could not soak through it effectively. That is why dentists often use an inferior alveolar nerve block for lower teeth, injecting the anesthetic near a major nerve trunk at the back of the jaw. This numbs the entire lower jaw, lip, and part of the tongue on that side. It works reliably, but the widespread numbness can be annoying and takes longer to wear off.

Research has shown that infiltration injections can sometimes work for lower teeth as well, because the anesthetic can reach the tooth through small accessory openings in the jawbone rather than having to penetrate the thick outer plate.6PubMed Central. Comparison of Pain Perception Between Local Infiltration and Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block Injection Techniques in Patients Undergoing Orthodontic Lower Premolar Extractions This is especially true with articaine, which has unusually good bone-penetrating properties. Some dentists now use infiltration for lower premolars and even molars when the situation allows, which means less widespread numbness for the patient.

Strategies That Make the Shot Hurt Less

Dental injection pain is a real barrier for many people, and the profession has invested heavily in reducing it. Beyond the topical gel already described, three main approaches are used in modern offices.

Buffered Anesthetic Solutions

Anesthetic cartridges are manufactured at an acidic pH to keep the drug stable on the shelf. That acidity is one reason injections sting. By adding a small amount of sodium bicarbonate (essentially baking soda) to the solution just before injection, the dentist raises the pH closer to the body’s natural level. Studies consistently show this reduces injection pain. One clinical comparison found that buffered lidocaine produced pain scores of about 2.8 out of 10, compared with 4.2 for standard lidocaine, and the onset of numbness was roughly twice as fast.7PubMed Central. Evaluating Pain, Onset of Action, Duration, and Anesthetic Efficacy of Conventional and Buffered Lidocaine in Infiltration Anesthesia: A Comparative Clinical Study A systematic review of pediatric patients confirmed the trend, showing a meaningful reduction in pain scores with buffered solutions.8PubMed Central. Effectiveness of buffered local anesthetic solutions in pediatric nerve blocks and infiltration anesthesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis Another study found that buffering also extended the duration of numbness after the procedure and reduced early postoperative pain.9PubMed Central. A Comparative Study to Evaluate the Anesthetic Efficacy of Buffered Versus Non-buffered 2% Lidocaine During Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block

Computer-Controlled Delivery Systems

Part of what makes an injection hurt is the pressure spike when solution is pushed into tissue too quickly. Computer-controlled local anesthetic delivery (CCLAD) systems use a motorized handpiece that regulates the flow rate and pressure automatically. The device looks less like a traditional syringe, which is a secondary benefit for anxious patients. A systematic review of randomized trials found that these devices produced significantly lower pain perception scores and also improved patient cooperation.10PubMed Central. Efficacy of computer-controlled local anesthesia delivery system on pain in dental anesthesia: a systematic review of randomized clinical trials A randomized trial comparing the two approaches directly reported mean pain scores of about 2.2 for the computer-controlled system versus 4.2 for a conventional syringe.11PubMed Central. Comparison of computer-controlled versus conventional local anesthesia delivery systems: a randomized clinical trial Not every dental office has one, and the cartridges and equipment cost more, but the technology is becoming increasingly common, especially in pediatric practices.

Vibration Devices

A simpler approach uses a small vibrating device pressed against the gum near the injection site. The theory behind this is the gate control mechanism: vibration signals travel along faster nerve fibers and partially block the slower pain signals from reaching the brain. A randomized trial found that using a dental vibration tool during injections produced a statistically significant reduction in reported pain.12PubMed. Use of a Dental Vibration Tool to Reduce Pain From Digital Blocks: A Randomized Controlled Trial Products like DentalVibe are commercially available and relatively inexpensive, making them accessible even for small practices.

How Long Numbness Lasts and Whether It Can Be Reversed

One of the most common complaints after a dental visit is the lingering numbness. Depending on the drug used, the area treated, and whether epinephrine was included, soft-tissue numbness can last anywhere from one to five hours after the procedure. Bupivacaine, the longest-acting option, can leave you numb for six hours or more. This is a safety nuisance: people bite their lips, burn their tongues on hot drinks, or drool without realizing it.

To address this, a reversal agent called phentolamine mesylate (sold under the brand name OraVerse) was approved by the FDA. It is a vasodilator, meaning it does the opposite of epinephrine: it opens up blood vessels at the injection site so the anesthetic is carried away faster. OraVerse is the first and only product proven to safely speed up the reversal of dental numbness.13PubMed Central. OraVerse: Reverses Numbness After Dental Procedures In pediatric patients, injection of phentolamine substantially reduced the time needed for full reversal of numbness in the tongue and lip.14PubMed. Inferior alveolar nerve block anesthesia in children: The effect of ibuprofen and phentolamine mesylate on pain perception It involves an additional injection after the procedure is finished, so it is not used routinely, but it is helpful when patients need to get back to talking, eating, or presenting at a meeting quickly.

Needle-Free Options

For people who have severe needle phobia or for certain procedures on upper front teeth, a nasal spray anesthetic called Kovanaze has been available. It delivers a combination of tetracaine (a local anesthetic) and oxymetazoline (a decongestant that acts as a vasoconstrictor) through the nose. The anesthetic reaches the dental nerves of the upper jaw through the nasal anatomy. In clinical trials, the tetracaine-oxymetazoline spray achieved a success rate between 83% and 90% for providing enough numbness to perform restorative work on upper premolars, canines, and incisors.15PubMed. Intranasal tetracaine and oxymetazoline: a newly approved drug formulation that provides maxillary dental anesthesia without needles

That said, the spray only works for upper teeth, and a study comparing it head-to-head with traditional injections found its pulpal anesthesia success rate was much lower, at just 5%, compared with 85% for a standard lidocaine-epinephrine injection.16PubMed Central. Kovanaze Intranasal Spray vs Traditional Injected Anesthetics: a Study of Pulpal Blood Flow Utilizing Laser Doppler Flowmetry That enormous discrepancy likely reflects different measurement methods across studies, with the laser Doppler study measuring actual blood flow changes in the tooth’s pulp as its standard, which is a much stricter endpoint. In practice, the spray works well enough for minor procedures on upper teeth but is not a replacement for injections when deep, reliable numbness is needed.

Side Effects and Complications

Local anesthesia is generally safe, but no medical intervention is entirely without risk. The most common side effects are temporary and benign: a racing heartbeat from epinephrine, minor bruising or soreness at the injection site, and the inconvenience of prolonged numbness. Occasionally, the needle can nick a small blood vessel and cause a hematoma (a localized bruise inside the tissue), or the injection can temporarily affect nearby nerves that control muscles, leading to brief drooping of an eyelid or one side of the face.

More serious neurological complications are rare but documented. These can include paresthesia (lingering numbness or tingling that persists after the anesthetic should have worn off), which occasionally happens when a nerve is irritated or damaged during injection. A review of neurological complications cataloged effects ranging from diplopia (double vision) and temporary facial paralysis to, in very rare cases, prolonged nerve injury.17PubMed Central. Neurological Complications of Local Anesthesia in Dentistry: A Review Most of these resolve on their own within days to weeks. Permanent nerve damage from a dental injection is extraordinarily uncommon.

Systemic toxicity is another concern, though it is exceedingly rare at the doses used in dentistry. It can occur if too much anesthetic is administered or if the drug is accidentally injected into a blood vessel. Symptoms range from dizziness, ringing in the ears, and a metallic taste in the mouth to, in severe cases, seizures or cardiac issues. Dentists prevent this by aspirating (pulling back on the syringe plunger before injecting to check for blood) and by carefully calculating doses based on body weight.

Dosing Matters More for Children and Medically Compromised Patients

Children are not simply small adults when it comes to anesthetic dosing. Because they weigh less, the margin between an effective dose and a potentially toxic one is much narrower. Research using a dosing calculator found that even a single cartridge of lidocaine in a small infant can approach the maximum safe dose, and two cartridges of mepivacaine in a child weighing around 18 kilograms can exceed it.18PubMed Central. MaxSafe: a mobile-friendly calculator for fractional local anesthetic toxicity and epinephrine dose tracking in dental practice Pediatric dental guidelines set more conservative dose limits than those on the FDA label for exactly this reason.

Pregnant patients require careful drug selection as well. Lidocaine is generally considered the safest choice during pregnancy. Prilocaine combined with felypressin (a vasoconstrictor sometimes used as an alternative to epinephrine) is avoided because of the risk of fetal methemoglobinemia and the possibility of inducing premature labor.19PubMed Central. Selection of the safest local anesthetic for dental treatment in medically compromised patients: A comprehensive review Patients with liver disease, cardiovascular conditions, or certain metabolic disorders also need adjusted choices, since these conditions can affect how quickly the body processes the drug.

When the Numbing Just Does Not Work

If you have ever sat in the dental chair and felt pain despite multiple injections, you are not imagining it. Several factors can cause local anesthesia to fail. Active infection or inflammation in the area lowers the tissue pH, which makes the anesthetic less effective. Anatomical variations, like unusually positioned nerves or dense bone, can prevent the solution from reaching its target. Anxiety itself can lower pain thresholds and make a technically successful block feel inadequate.

Then there is genetics. Red-haired individuals have long reported needing more anesthesia, and research supports their experience. A study found that redheads required about 19% more of the general anesthetic desflurane than dark-haired women, and nine out of ten redheads in the study carried mutations on the MC1R gene.20PubMed Central. Anesthetic Requirement is Increased in Redheads A broader review confirmed that red-haired individuals display unique reactions to both local and general anesthesia, likely because MC1R gene variants affect how anesthetic drugs are processed in the body.21PubMed Central. A Comparative Analysis of the Efficacy of Local Anesthetics and Systemic Anesthetics in the Red-Headed Versus Non-Red-Headed Patient Population: A Comprehensive Review If you are a redhead who has struggled with dental numbness, telling your dentist before the procedure can help them plan for a higher dose or a different technique.

Allergic Reactions Are Rarer Than You Think

Many patients who report being “allergic to novocaine” or “allergic to dental anesthesia” are actually describing a response to something other than the anesthetic itself. True allergic reactions to the amide local anesthetics used in modern dentistry are extremely rare.22PubMed Central. True Allergy to Amide Local Anesthetics: A Review and Case Presentation What is far more common is a reaction to additives in the cartridge, particularly preservatives like metabisulfite or methylparaben, or simply the cardiovascular effects of epinephrine being mistaken for an allergic reaction.23PubMed Central. Allergic response to metabisulfite in lidocaine anesthetic solution

The distinction matters because a misdiagnosed “allergy” can lead to unnecessary avoidance of safe, effective anesthetics. If you have had a bad reaction in the past, an allergist can perform skin testing to determine whether you are truly allergic to the anesthetic drug or to one of the additives. In most cases, a preservative-free formulation of a different amide anesthetic solves the problem entirely. The older ester-type anesthetics like procaine (the original “novocaine”) were more likely to cause true allergic reactions, but they have largely been replaced in dental practice by the amide family, which is inherently less allergenic.

The Evolution of Local Anesthetics

The drugs dentists use today are the product of over a century of refinement. The story begins in 1884 with cocaine, which was the first substance recognized as a local anesthetic. Its clinical use spread rapidly across Europe and America, but its toxic effects and addictive potential soon became apparent, causing many deaths among both patients and medical staff who became addicted.3PubMed. From cocaine to ropivacaine: the history of local anesthetic drugs The search for safer alternatives led to the synthesis of procaine in 1905, which dominated dental anesthesia for decades. Lidocaine arrived in 1943 and proved to be more potent, faster-acting, and less likely to cause allergic reactions. Each subsequent generation of amide anesthetics has offered incremental improvements in duration, potency, or side-effect profiles. Articaine, synthesized in 1969 and widely adopted more recently, is the newest drug to gain significant market share in dental offices.

Research continues on entirely new delivery mechanisms and formulations. Liposomal encapsulation (packing anesthetic molecules inside tiny fat bubbles for slow release), sustained-release polymer gels, and even gene-therapy approaches to modulate nerve signaling are all being explored in early-stage studies. For now, though, the basic toolkit of a topical agent followed by an injectable amide anesthetic with or without epinephrine remains the global standard, and it works remarkably well for the overwhelming majority of dental patients.