What Bacteria Are Linked to Alzheimer’s Disease?

Alzheimer’s Disease (AD) is a progressive neurological disorder characterized by debilitating memory loss and a steady decline in cognitive function. For decades, the dominant scientific explanation focused on the accumulation of two protein abnormalities: extracellular amyloid plaques and intracellular tau tangles. The Amyloid Cascade Hypothesis proposed that the buildup of amyloid-beta (Aβ) protein initiated the entire pathological process. However, the failure of many drug trials targeting Aβ and the discovery that some cognitively healthy individuals harbor significant plaque burden has prompted a search for initiating factors. Recent scientific inquiry has increasingly focused on the possibility that chronic infections, particularly involving certain bacteria, may serve as a trigger for the brain changes seen in AD. This emerging perspective suggests a potential upstream cause that sets the traditional pathology in motion.

The Specific Pathogen Candidates

The strongest and most compelling bacterial candidate currently under investigation is Porphyromonas gingivalis, the primary bacterium responsible for chronic periodontitis, or severe gum disease. This bacterium produces toxic enzymes called gingipains, which have been detected in the brain tissue of individuals with Alzheimer’s Disease. The level of these gingipains in post-mortem brains correlates with the severity of tau and ubiquitin pathology. Animal models show that oral infection with P. gingivalis leads to colonization of the brain and the subsequent development of AD-like neuropathological features, including increased amyloid-beta production.

Other bacterial types have also been found in association with AD pathology. Various Spirochetes, including oral species like Treponema denticola and the Lyme disease agent Borrelia burgdorferi, have been identified in the brains of AD patients. These bacteria establish chronic, persistent infections in the central nervous system. Similarly, Chlamydia pneumoniae, a common respiratory pathogen, has been detected in a high percentage of post-mortem AD brains, often co-localizing with amyloid plaques and neurofibrillary tangles. The presence of these diverse pathogens suggests that the link to AD may involve a general pattern of chronic microbial invasion.

How Infection Drives Pathology

The biological mechanism connecting peripheral infection to brain pathology is explained by the Antimicrobial Protection Hypothesis. This theory proposes that the amyloid-beta protein is not inherently pathological but functions as an antimicrobial peptide within the brain’s innate immune system. When a microbe manages to cross the blood-brain barrier, the brain reacts by producing Aβ to entrap and neutralize the invader. This Aβ surrounds the pathogen, forming the sticky aggregates that become the recognizable amyloid plaques.

This immune response, while initially protective, becomes detrimental when the infection is chronic or persistent. The sustained presence of the bacteria or their toxic byproducts forces the brain to continuously produce Aβ. The process of sequestering microbes within Aβ plaques drives chronic neuroinflammation, which is a state of perpetual immune activation. This long-term inflammation leads to the eventual dysfunction and death of surrounding neurons. Therefore, the infectious trigger results in the pathology—amyloid plaques and neuroinflammation—that defines the disease.

Integrating the Microbial and Traditional Theories

The microbial hypothesis provides a potential explanation for the initiation of the process described by the traditional Amyloid Cascade Hypothesis. The infectious perspective suggests a trigger event for the amyloid accumulation. Microbes cause the initial production of Aβ as an immune defense, thereby setting the stage for the progressive pathology that was previously attributed to misfolded proteins alone. The infectious agents, or the toxins they produce, can also directly cause the hyperphosphorylation of the tau protein, which forms the neurofibrillary tangles inside neurons.

Establishing a definitive causal link between bacteria and AD remains challenging. The difficulty lies in distinguishing whether the bacteria found in AD brains are the cause of the disease or merely opportunistic organisms that colonize tissue already damaged by the neurodegenerative process. Proving causation requires demonstrating that eliminating the pathogen would prevent or reverse the disease, which is complex in human studies. Furthermore, AD is known to be a disease with multiple contributing factors, including genetic predispositions like the ApoE4 allele, which likely increase susceptibility to the chronic inflammation caused by the pathogens. The microbial hypothesis thus recontextualizes the traditional AD hallmarks, suggesting they are the brain’s failed attempt to fight a chronic infection.

New Directions for Prevention and Treatment

If the microbial hypothesis proves correct, it opens entirely new avenues for therapeutic intervention that go beyond the traditional approach of simply clearing amyloid plaques. The most direct strategy involves targeting the specific pathogens or their virulence factors. Research has focused on developing small-molecule inhibitors that block the activity of gingipains, the toxic proteases produced by P. gingivalis. These inhibitors are designed to reduce the bacterial load in the brain and block the toxic effects that lead to neurodegeneration.

In preclinical models, treatment with a gingipain inhibitor was shown to decrease the bacterial DNA abundance in the brain, reduce amyloid-beta production, and mitigate neuroinflammation. One such compound, atuzaginstat (COR388), has progressed into clinical trials to assess its safety and efficacy in human AD patients. Another approach is the use of vaccines designed to neutralize the infectious agents before they can cross into the central nervous system. Additionally, therapeutic efforts are aimed at controlling the resulting damage by using anti-inflammatory treatments to dampen the chronic neuroinflammation that is sustained by the persistent infection.