What Are the Odds of Getting ALS?

Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder that targets motor neurons, the nerve cells in the brain and spinal cord controlling voluntary muscle movement. As these cells die, the muscles they control weaken and atrophy, leading to paralysis. Understanding the odds of developing this condition requires examining population statistics and individual risk factors.

Understanding Incidence and Prevalence

ALS is considered a rare disease, yet the estimated lifetime risk of developing it is approximately 1 in 400 for the average person. The statistical rarity of ALS is measured by two metrics: incidence and prevalence. Incidence refers to the rate of new cases diagnosed each year, typically ranging from 1 to 2 new cases per 100,000 people annually across Western populations. Prevalence measures the total number of people living with the disease at a given time. In the United States, prevalence estimates suggest about 5.2 people per 100,000 are currently living with ALS, and the total number of individuals living with ALS in the U.S. is projected to be around 33,000 and is expected to rise due to an aging population.

Key Demographic Risk Factors

The likelihood of developing ALS is not uniform across the population, as certain demographic characteristics affect individual risk. Age is the strongest known risk factor, with the disease being extremely rare before age 40 and increasing exponentially thereafter. The mean age of symptom onset falls between 58 and 63 years old, and peak incidence occurs in the 70-79 age group. Gender also plays a role in the odds of diagnosis; men are statistically more likely to develop ALS than women, with the ratio often cited between 1.2:1 and 1.6:1. This difference is most pronounced in younger age groups, tending to equalize after age 70, and Non-Hispanic white individuals have shown higher rates of ALS diagnosis compared to other racial and ethnic groups.

The Role of Genetics Versus Sporadic Occurrence

The vast majority of ALS cases, approximately 90% to 95%, are classified as Sporadic ALS (SALS), meaning the affected person has no known family history. The cause is believed to stem from a complex interaction between genetic susceptibility and external factors.

A smaller percentage, about 5% to 10% of cases, are Familial ALS (FALS), where the disease runs in the family. If a person has a first-degree relative with ALS, their lifetime risk increases substantially compared to the general population, though it remains low. The presence of FALS indicates a strong genetic component, often inherited in an autosomal dominant pattern.

Genetic testing has identified mutations in various genes that cause or increase the risk of ALS. The most common genetic cause is a mutation in the C9orf72 gene, responsible for 25% to 40% of all FALS cases. Mutations in the SOD1 gene are the second most common cause of FALS, accounting for 10% to 20% of cases, while other genes like TARDBP and FUS are implicated in smaller percentages. A small proportion of people diagnosed with SALS also carry an ALS-linked genetic mutation, demonstrating that genetic factors contribute to the individual odds.

Investigating Environmental and Lifestyle Contributions

Researchers are investigating external factors that might trigger the disease in genetically susceptible individuals. These environmental and lifestyle contributions are thought to slightly shift an individual’s risk, often relying on correlational evidence rather than direct proof.

Smoking is considered a probable risk factor for ALS. Some studies suggest the risk is particularly elevated for women.

Research also consistently shows an increased risk among military veterans, though the exact cause remains unclear, possibly involving exposure to environmental toxins or traumatic injuries. Occupational and toxic exposures are another area of investigation; heavy metals like lead and mercury, as well as pesticides and solvents, have been studied for their potential link to ALS. A history of head or spinal cord trauma has also been associated with a higher risk of developing the condition.