Is Yellowfin Tuna Sustainable?

The yellowfin tuna, Thunnus albacares, is a prized pelagic species found in tropical and subtropical oceans worldwide, holding a significant place in the global seafood market. Known for its firm, pink-to-red flesh, it is highly valued for both the raw sashimi trade and canned tuna production. Yellowfin accounted for approximately 31% of the global commercial tuna catch in 2023, underscoring its economic importance. The question of its sustainability is complex, as the health of its population depends entirely on the specific ocean it comes from and the method used to catch it.

Global Population Health and Status

Stock assessments, which monitor the biomass and reproductive capacity of the species, show the health of the yellowfin population varies greatly by region. In the Atlantic Ocean, the stock is currently considered healthy, with the 2022 assessment indicating the population was not overfished and overfishing was not occurring. The median estimate for the spawning stock biomass was found to be above the level associated with the Maximum Sustainable Yield (MSY) with high probability.

In contrast, the Indian Ocean stock has faced significant challenges and has been classified as overfished and subject to overfishing. This designation indicates that the reproductive biomass has been reduced too low and the current rate of removal is too high for long-term health. The Eastern Pacific Ocean stock is also viewed as overfished, reflecting a global pattern where management success is inconsistent.

Fishing Techniques and Environmental Impact

The method used to harvest yellowfin tuna is a major determinant of its environmental impact. The majority of the global tuna catch, approximately two-thirds, is taken by large-scale commercial fishing operations, primarily using purse seines and longlines. Purse seine vessels often utilize Fish Aggregating Devices (FADs), floating objects that attract tuna and other marine life. The use of FADs significantly increases the capture of juvenile yellowfin and bigeye tuna, negatively impacting the future reproductive potential of the stock.

FAD sets also have a high bycatch rate of non-target species, which can be two to four times higher than fishing on free-swimming schools. This accidental catch includes vulnerable species such as sea turtles, sharks, and various types of rays. Longline fishing, which uses lines that can stretch for miles with thousands of baited hooks, is also associated with high bycatch, sometimes exceeding 20% of the total catch.

The most environmentally sound method is pole-and-line or handline fishing, which targets individual fish and has a minimal bycatch rate, often less than 1%. These methods are highly selective, catching fewer juvenile fish and resulting in a much cleaner environmental record.

Regional Differences in Management

Yellowfin tuna, as a highly migratory species, is managed by five intergovernmental Regional Fisheries Management Organizations (RFMOs) across the globe. These organizations set quotas and conservation measures, but their effectiveness varies widely, leading to pronounced regional differences in stock health.

RFMOs responsible for management include:

  • The International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas (ICCAT), which manages the Atlantic stock currently considered healthy.
  • The Indian Ocean Tuna Commission (IOTC), which has struggled to implement measures sufficient to prevent the overfished status of its yellowfin stock.
  • The Inter-American Tropical Tuna Commission (IATTC), which manages the Eastern Pacific.
  • The Western and Central Pacific Fisheries Commission (WCPFC), which oversees the world’s largest tuna fishing ground.

These bodies are responsible for setting Total Allowable Catches (TACs) and regulating the use of fishing gear like FADs. The differences in regulatory rigor, monitoring, and compliance among these RFMOs explain why the same species can be a sustainable choice in one ocean but a poor choice in another.

Consumer Guidance and Certification

Consumers can make informed choices by prioritizing yellowfin tuna identified by specific certification labels and fishing methods. The Marine Stewardship Council (MSC) label, identifiable by its blue fish tick, signifies that the tuna comes from a fishery assessed as sustainable by independent scientists. An MSC-certified fishery confirms that the stock is healthy, the environmental impact is minimal, and the management system is robust.

Beyond certification, consumers should look for products labeled as “pole-and-line” or “handline” caught, as these methods inherently reduce bycatch and environmental harm. Third-party guides, such as the Monterey Bay Aquarium Seafood Watch, also offer specific recommendations. These guides often rate yellowfin caught by pole-and-line as a “Best Choice,” while longline-caught yellowfin from regions with poor stock health, like the Southwest Atlantic, are often listed as an “Avoid” choice. Interpreting the label for both the catch method and the ocean of origin is the most practical way to support sustainable yellowfin fisheries.