Is Thrifting Actually Good for the Environment?

Thrifting, the act of purchasing pre-owned goods, is fundamentally beneficial for the environment. Choosing secondhand items generates substantial environmental savings, primarily by avoiding the intense resource consumption required for new production. However, the rapidly growing resale market also introduces complexities related to logistics and managing overwhelming volumes of unwanted textiles. Understanding these layers reveals why thrifting is a powerful tool for sustainability, though not a perfect one.

Reducing the Demand for New Manufacturing

Choosing a pre-owned garment directly undercuts the demand for new clothing manufacturing, which is where the most significant environmental gains occur. The fashion industry is a large consumer of resources, contributing substantially to global carbon emissions and water pollution.

The production of raw materials requires immense resources. Growing enough cotton for one shirt requires thousands of gallons of water, while synthetic fibers like polyester rely heavily on fossil fuel extraction, increasing greenhouse gas emissions.

The manufacturing phase is energy-intensive and uses a large volume of chemicals. Textile dyeing and finishing processes are particularly problematic, contributing to water pollution when chemical-laden wastewater is discharged untreated into waterways.

Purchasing a garment that has already been produced saves the water, energy, and chemicals required for a new equivalent. Reusing textiles can save up to 85% of the energy required for new clothing production, demonstrating the power of extending an item’s lifespan.

Diverting Waste from Landfills

Beyond avoiding new production, thrifting and donation keep textiles out of overflowing disposal sites. The United States alone sends millions of tons of textile waste to landfills annually, making up a notable portion of all municipal solid waste.

Discarded textiles can take up to 200 years to decompose, with synthetic fibers remaining for centuries. When natural fibers break down in the oxygen-deprived environment of a landfill, they release methane, a potent greenhouse gas. Chemicals and dyes within the textiles can also leach into the soil and contaminate groundwater.

Globally, up to 85% of all textiles end up in landfills or incinerated each year. Every piece of clothing successfully sold and worn secondhand represents a continued use cycle that delays its contribution to the waste stream. By extending the utility of an item, thrifting acts as a critical buffer against the environmental pressures of a linear “take-make-waste” economy.

Navigating the Environmental Nuances of Resale

While the benefits are clear, the rapidly expanding resale market introduces complexities that challenge the notion of a perfectly green solution. The logistics involved in collecting, sorting, processing, and shipping used clothing across vast distances create a carbon footprint that must be acknowledged. Large-scale operations require significant energy for sorting and transportation before items reach a new buyer.

A major challenge is over-donation, where the volume of textiles collected exceeds the capacity of the secondhand market to absorb them. Many donated items, particularly low-quality fast fashion, are deemed unsaleable due to poor condition or lack of demand. This surplus is often exported to developing nations, where it can saturate local markets and still end up in landfills or incinerators.

The international shipping of these unwanted textiles can negate some environmental savings, as the transport and sorting of exported goods can multiply their emissions compared to local processing. Thrifting remains beneficial when it replaces the purchase of a new item. However, the system must manage the flow of donations and the fate of unpurchased goods to fully maximize its environmental potential.