Is It Better for a Bullet to Go Through or Stay In?

The question of whether a bullet should exit the body or remain lodged inside is a complex medical triage decision, not a simple preference for one outcome over the other. The severity of a gunshot wound is dictated largely by the projectile’s trajectory and the kinetic energy transferred to the body’s tissues. The presence or absence of an exit wound is only one factor in determining the overall damage. Medical professionals prioritize the patient’s immediate survival and stabilization before addressing the projectile itself.

Understanding the Immediate Internal Trauma

The most devastating damage from a gunshot wound occurs in the milliseconds following impact, regardless of whether the projectile remains in the body or passes through. This damage is governed by the physics of energy transfer, where velocity plays a significantly larger role than the projectile’s mass. Since the energy transferred is a function of mass multiplied by the square of the velocity, a small increase in speed results in a disproportionately greater increase in destructive energy.

The initial mechanical destruction creates two distinct types of cavities. The permanent cavity is the track of crushed and lacerated tissue left behind by the physical passage of the projectile. Its size is determined by the bullet’s diameter and any deformation or tumbling that occurs during its travel.

More extensive damage, particularly with high-velocity rounds, is caused by temporary cavitation. As the projectile rapidly passes through tissue, it creates a shockwave that pushes and stretches surrounding structures far beyond the bullet’s actual diameter. This temporary cavity can momentarily expand up to 30 times the size of the projectile, causing tearing and microscopic damage to tissues not directly in the bullet’s path. Tissues that are dense and less elastic, such as the liver or brain, are particularly susceptible to this bursting effect, which can result in widespread destruction.

Factors Guiding Projectile Removal

The decision to remove or retain a projectile is a nuanced judgment made after the patient is stabilized, weighing the risk of surgery against potential long-term complications. In the acute trauma setting, the medical priority is always to stop active bleeding, secure the airway, and stabilize the patient’s overall condition. Projectile removal is rarely the immediate, life-saving procedure unless the object is directly causing a mechanical obstruction or hemorrhage that cannot be controlled.

Removal is indicated in specific anatomical locations where retention is deemed too dangerous. These include fragments lodged within a joint capsule, where they can cause cartilage destruction and chronic inflammation. Projectiles that have migrated into the lumen of a major blood vessel are also candidates for removal due to the risk of distal embolization, where the fragment travels through the bloodstream and blocks a smaller artery.

Other locations requiring intervention include the globe of the eye, the spinal canal, or any fragment actively impinging upon a peripheral nerve. Conversely, a projectile is often left in place if its removal would require extensive dissection through healthy tissue, potentially introducing more trauma than the original injury. Fragments resting harmlessly in muscle or subcutaneous tissue are frequently retained, especially if they are located near major vascular structures or deep within the brain or spine, where surgical access carries a high risk of permanent neurological or vascular injury.

Long-Term Complications of Retained Objects

While many retained projectiles are quickly encapsulated by fibrous tissue and cause no further issues, specific risks may manifest years after the initial injury. One concern is lead toxicity (plumbism), which occurs when lead leaches from the bullet into the bloodstream. This risk is heightened when the fragment is lodged within a joint space or a body cavity containing fluid, such as synovial fluid or cerebrospinal fluid, where chemical dissolution occurs more readily.

Another complication is projectile migration, where the retained object slowly moves from its initial resting place. This movement, though rare, can cause new problems if the fragment shifts into a vascular structure, leading to vessel occlusion, or moves to compress a nearby nerve. Migration has been documented in various parts of the body, including the spinal cord and heart chambers, creating delayed and unpredictable symptoms.

The presence of metallic fragments can also complicate future medical imaging, particularly Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). While computed tomography (CT) scans are routinely used to localize fragments, the strong magnetic field of an MRI machine carries the risk of displacing ferromagnetic fragments, potentially causing injury to surrounding tissues. Many patients with retained fragments also experience chronic, localized pain or a low-grade foreign body reaction at the site of the embedded material.