Is Clubfoot Genetic? Causes and Inheritance

Clubfoot is a congenital foot deformity where the foot is twisted inward and downward, affecting about 1 in every 1,000 live births worldwide. It can range in severity from mild to severe and often requires medical intervention shortly after birth. While the exact cause of clubfoot is often complex, genetics play a significant role, influencing its development and presentation.

Genetic Basis of Clubfoot

Clubfoot often has a genetic component. It is not typically caused by a single gene but involves multiple genes (polygenic inheritance) or a combination of genetic and environmental factors (multifactorial inheritance). Researchers observe a higher incidence of clubfoot in families with a history of the condition, suggesting a genetic link. For instance, twin studies show a higher concordance rate in identical twins compared to fraternal twins, further supporting a genetic basis.

The prevalence of clubfoot also varies across different ethnic populations, with lower rates in Chinese populations and higher rates among Hawaiians and Maoris, which also points to genetic influences. Males are twice as likely as females to develop clubfoot, a consistent observation across various ethnic groups. This male predominance and familial clustering highlight the role of genetic factors.

Specific Genetic Factors and Inheritance

Clubfoot inheritance often follows a multifactorial model, with several genes contributing. Studies have identified specific genes and chromosomal regions implicated in clubfoot development. For example, mutations in the PITX1 gene, a gene involved in early hindlimb development, have been linked to clubfoot in some families. A missense mutation in PITX1 was found to segregate with clubfoot in a five-generation family, and a microdeletion involving PITX1 has also been identified in patients with familial isolated clubfoot.

Another gene, TBX4, a direct transcriptional target of PITX1, has also been associated with clubfoot. Copy number variants in the chromosome 17q23 region, containing TBX4, are responsible for approximately 5% of familial isolated clubfoot cases. These findings underscore the importance of proper gene dosage for TBX4 in hindlimb development. While these genes and regions have been identified, they do not account for all cases, reinforcing the complex nature of clubfoot.

Rarely, clubfoot can be part of a larger genetic syndrome, such as trisomy 18 or chromosome 22q11 deletion syndrome, where it is one of many associated abnormalities. Isolated clubfoot, without other major abnormalities, is more common and considered multifactorial. Research also suggests that common genetic variants, known as single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), near HOX homeobox genes, insulin-like growth factor binding protein 3 (IGFBP3), and caspase genes might contribute to clubfoot susceptibility, each conferring a small increase in risk.

Gene-Environment Interaction

While genetic predispositions are significant, environmental factors can also influence the development of clubfoot, often interacting with an individual’s genetic makeup. Certain exposures during pregnancy may increase the risk, particularly in those with a genetic susceptibility. For instance, maternal smoking during pregnancy is consistently shown to increase the risk for clubfoot, potentially doubling the chances compared to non-smoking mothers. This risk can be amplified substantially, even up to twenty-fold, when maternal smoking is combined with a family history of clubfoot.

Other environmental factors that may contribute include insufficient amniotic fluid (oligohydramnios) in the womb, which has been associated with an increased risk for clubfoot. Exposure to certain medications and some infections during pregnancy, such as Zika virus, have also been identified as potential risk factors. These environmental influences are generally not the sole cause for isolated clubfoot but can act as triggers or modifiers in individuals who are already genetically predisposed.

Implications for Families

For families with a history of clubfoot, understanding genetic components and recurrence risks is important. If one child has clubfoot, the recurrence risk for future pregnancies is higher than in the general population, though it remains relatively low due to the multifactorial nature of the condition. For example, if a previous male fetus was affected, the risk for a subsequent pregnancy is around 2%, and if a previous affected fetus was female, the risk increases to about 5%. A general estimate for recurrence if one sibling has clubfoot is approximately 3%.

Genetic counseling offers valuable support for families with a history of clubfoot. Counselors can assess individual family risks, explain inheritance patterns, and provide detailed information about the likelihood of recurrence in future pregnancies. This information helps parents make informed decisions about family planning. Prenatal diagnosis, often through routine ultrasound examinations, can sometimes detect clubfoot before birth, allowing for early intervention and treatment planning. Early detection helps families prepare for necessary treatment, typically involving manipulation, serial casting, and bracing, to achieve good long-term function.

What Is Genetic Leakage and Why Does It Matter?

Does Epilepsy Skip a Generation? A Genetic Explanation

Centromere: Definition, Function, and Structure