How Was Bacteria First Discovered?

Bacteria, the single-celled organisms that form an invisible world around and within us, were completely unknown to science for centuries. These organisms are the most numerous form of life on Earth and have existed for billions of years. Before the 17th century, the existence of such minute life was considered impossible, and phenomena like disease or fermentation were attributed to vague forces or chemical processes. The revelation of this microscopic universe required a technological leap and an unprecedented level of curiosity.

The Technological Precursor: Early Microscopy

The concept of using lenses to magnify small objects was not new; simple magnifying glasses had been used since the 13th century. By the early 1600s, spectacle makers in the Netherlands assembled the first compound microscopes, which used multiple lenses to achieve magnification. Devices like those used by Robert Hooke for his 1665 publication Micrographia could magnify objects up to about 20 to 30 times their actual size.

The reliance on multiple lenses introduced significant optical flaws, notably chromatic and spherical aberration, resulting in blurry images with colored halos. This limitation meant that while larger structures like plant cells could be observed, bacteria remained indistinct and undetectable. The discovery of bacteria required a superior lens capable of much higher resolution than the early compound microscopes could provide.

Anton van Leeuwenhoek and the Observation of “Animalcules”

Antonie van Leeuwenhoek, a Dutch draper from Delft, first broke through the barrier of the invisible. He had no formal university training and taught himself the art of grinding incredibly small, high-quality lenses. He created simple, single-lens microscopes that looked like small paddles with a powerful lens embedded in a metal plate.

Leeuwenhoek’s instruments were technically superior to the compound microscopes of the era, achieving magnifications of up to 200 to 300 times with remarkable clarity. Driven by curiosity, he began examining various samples, including pond water and scrapings from his own teeth. In a 1677 letter to the Royal Society of London, he described seeing what he called “animalcules,” or “wee little beasties,” swimming vigorously.

His descriptions and drawings of these moving organisms are now recognized as the first documented observations of both protozoa and bacteria. He described the different shapes of the microbes—rods, spheres, and spirals—which correspond to the basic morphologies of bacteria. Leeuwenhoek’s observations gave humanity its first glimpse into the microbial world.

Integrating Microbes into Biological Understanding

Leeuwenhoek’s initial findings were met with disbelief and wonder by the scientific community. The idea of an entire unseen world of constantly moving creatures was so foreign that the Royal Society struggled to confirm his claims until Robert Hooke replicated some observations. This discovery did not immediately lead to an understanding of bacteria’s role in the world.

For over a century, a major debate centered on spontaneous generation—the idea that life could arise spontaneously from non-living matter. Lazzaro Spallanzani challenged this notion in 1768 by conducting experiments with broth. Spallanzani demonstrated that if he boiled broth long enough to sterilize it and then sealed the container, no microorganisms would grow.

The biological significance of Leeuwenhoek’s “animalcules” was not established until the mid-19th century. Scientists like Louis Pasteur and Robert Koch built upon this foundation, demonstrating that specific microbes were responsible for fermentation, spoilage, and infectious diseases. This work confirmed the importance of the life forms Leeuwenhoek had first glimpsed, establishing the science of microbiology and altering human understanding of life and disease.