How to Improve Electronic Health Records

Electronic Health Records (EHRs) were introduced to digitize patient information, ensuring continuity of care and improving health outcomes. These systems replaced paper charts, promising instant, secure access to a patient’s comprehensive medical history across authorized providers and care settings. However, current EHRs often fall short of this intended efficiency, creating structural and design issues that impede care delivery. Poorly designed systems contribute to administrative burden, compromise data integrity, and distract clinicians from direct patient interaction. Addressing these shortcomings requires a multipronged approach focusing on user experience, seamless data flow, content standardization, and intelligent application of collected information.

Enhancing Clinical Usability and Workflow

The primary source of frustration for healthcare providers is the administrative burden imposed by overly complex EHR interfaces, often leading to physician burnout. Many systems focus on billing and regulatory compliance rather than the provider’s clinical workflow, forcing users to navigate excessive screens and clicks. A focused effort on user interface (UI) and user experience (UX) design is necessary to streamline these processes, reducing the “click fatigue” that consumes a significant portion of a clinician’s workday.

Optimizing documentation requires moving away from one-size-fits-all platforms toward incorporating specialty-specific templates that align with the natural flow of a clinical encounter. For instance, an orthopedic surgeon requires a different documentation template than a cardiologist. Systems must be flexible enough to reflect these distinct workflows without excessive customization. Furthermore, incorporating modern voice recognition technology, which utilizes Natural Language Processing (NLP), significantly speeds up data input by converting spoken words into structured data fields.

Another obstacle to efficient workflow is “alert fatigue,” where clinicians become desensitized to excessive, non-specific notifications. To counteract this, EHRs must implement smarter, context-specific alert management systems. These systems should prioritize warnings based on the patient’s physiological state, known allergies, and comprehensive medication profile. Reducing the volume of irrelevant pop-ups ensures that truly critical alerts, such as a life-threatening drug interaction, are noticed and acted upon immediately.

Establishing True Interoperability and Data Exchange

A significant failing of current EHR systems is the “siloing” of patient information, where data remains locked within a single hospital or practice, making it difficult to share records with outside providers. Achieving true interoperability requires adopting modern, open standards for secure data exchange across different platforms. The Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (FHIR) standard, developed by Health Level Seven International (HL7), defines “resources” that represent granular pieces of clinical data, such as a patient or a medication.

FHIR utilizes modern web technologies, specifically RESTful Application Programming Interfaces (APIs), allowing different systems to access and exchange data in a modular, standardized format. This enables developers to create applications that pull relevant data from any FHIR-compliant EHR, facilitating a connected health information network. This capability is important for patients who receive care from multiple specialists or transition between different care settings.

Seamless data movement also depends on accurately linking all records to the correct individual, a challenge known as patient matching. Inconsistent data entry often creates duplicate or fragmented patient records across systems. Centralized Enterprise Master Patient Index (EMPI) systems use advanced algorithms to reconcile these discrepancies. By consistently linking a patient’s records across disparate systems, EMPIs ensure that providers have a complete, unified view of the patient’s health history, which is essential for safety and coordinated care.

Leveraging Standardization for Data Quality

The utility of EHR data for patient care and large-scale analysis hinges on its consistency and structure. Data is categorized into structured formats, which are quantitative and searchable (e.g., vital signs, lab results, and medication lists), and unstructured formats, which are free text found in clinical notes and reports. While unstructured data provides rich context, it is difficult for a computer to process.

To maximize the value of this information, EHRs must enforce the use of standardized medical terminologies, or controlled vocabularies, upon data entry. For instance, the Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine – Clinical Terms (SNOMED CT) is a comprehensive vocabulary used to codify diagnoses and clinical findings. The Logical Observation Identifiers Names and Codes (LOINC) standard identifies laboratory tests and clinical observations, allowing systems to compare results from different facilities.

Mandating these codified terminologies transforms clinical narratives into structured, computable data that can be searched, aggregated, and analyzed by automated systems. This standardization is foundational to interoperability, ensuring that when data is exchanged, different systems interpret the information with the same meaning, a concept known as semantic interoperability. Consistent, codified data entry is the prerequisite for generating accurate clinical insights and supporting advanced decision-making tools.

Integrating Advanced Decision Support Systems

With improved usability, interoperability, and standardized data quality established, the EHR can transition from a passive documentation tool to an active, intelligent partner in clinical care. Advanced Decision Support Systems (DSS) leverage the wealth of structured and unstructured data to provide customized, real-time guidance to clinicians at the point of care. This capability is powered by artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) models integrated directly into the workflow.

One of the most impactful applications is the use of ML models to predict patient risk hours before a decline becomes clinically obvious. For instance, AI algorithms trained on comprehensive EHR data can accurately predict the onset of severe sepsis, a time-sensitive condition where early intervention dramatically improves outcomes. These sophisticated models analyze hundreds of data points, including patient demographics, vital signs, lab results, and even insights extracted from clinical notes using Natural Language Processing.

Furthermore, the availability of high-quality, structured data enables automated quality measure reporting, known as electronic Clinical Quality Measures (eCQMs) or Digital Quality Measures (dQMs). This automation replaces the manual, resource-intensive process of chart abstraction, allowing healthcare organizations to efficiently meet regulatory compliance and participate in value-based care models where reimbursement is tied to demonstrated quality outcomes.