How the Scientific Naming of Bacteria Works
Scientific names for bacteria follow a regulated system. Learn how this language encodes a microbe's history, characteristics, and its relationships in the natural world.
Scientific names for bacteria follow a regulated system. Learn how this language encodes a microbe's history, characteristics, and its relationships in the natural world.
Bacterial names can appear complex, a string of foreign words that seem impenetrable to the non-scientist. This complexity, however, conceals a logical international system that follows a structured set of rules understood globally by the scientific community. Understanding this system reveals a hidden layer of meaning, history, and biology packed into just two words.
The scientific name of a bacterium is based on a two-part system called binomial nomenclature, a legacy of the Swedish naturalist Carl Linnaeus. This framework assigns each species a name composed of two Latin or latinized words. The first part is the genus name, which is always capitalized, and the second is the species epithet, which is written in lowercase. Together, these two parts form the species name, which is consistently italicized in text.
A well-known example is Escherichia coli. In this case, Escherichia is the genus, a category that groups together several closely related species. The word coli is the species epithet, which distinguishes this particular organism from other species within the same genus. In the bacterial world, a species is generally defined as a group of organisms that share a high degree of similarity in their genetic makeup and physical characteristics.
The use of this standardized naming convention eliminates the confusion from common or local names, which vary dramatically by region or language. A formal scientific name ensures that researchers across the world are referring to the exact same organism. This precision is important for communication in research, medicine, and public health, allowing scientists to track disease outbreaks, share data, and build upon each other’s work.
The naming of a new bacterium is a formal process governed by international rules to ensure each name is unique and systematically applied. This prevents the same name from being given to different microbes, or multiple names to the same one. The system is overseen by the International Committee on Systematics of Prokaryotes (ICSP), which enforces the rules in the International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes (ICNP).
For a new bacterium’s name to be officially recognized, scientists must follow several steps. First, they must isolate the organism and grow it as a pure culture. This is followed by a characterization, where they document its unique metabolic, genetic, and physical properties. They then propose a name that has not been used before and adheres to the grammatical rules of Latin.
A primary step is the formal publication of the new name and its description in a peer-reviewed scientific journal. The main venue for this is the International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology (IJSEM), the official registry for new prokaryotic names. Researchers must also deposit a living sample of their discovery in at least two separate public culture collections. This sample, known as a “type strain,” serves as a permanent, accessible reference point for other scientists.
The Latin and Greek roots of bacterial names often provide descriptive clues about the organism. Many names are derived from the bacterium’s appearance under a microscope. For example, Staphylococcus aureus gets its name from the Greek staphyle (“bunch of grapes”), describing its cellular arrangement, and the Latin aureus (“golden”), for the color of its colonies.
Other bacteria are named in honor of the scientists who discovered them or made significant contributions to microbiology. These names, known as eponyms, serve as a lasting tribute. Salmonella, for instance, was named after Daniel E. Salmon, an American veterinarian who helped first isolate the bacterium.
The place where a bacterium was first discovered is another common source for its name. Thermus aquaticus, a bacterium important to modern molecular biology, was first isolated from the hot aquatic environments of Yellowstone National Park. Some names reflect the organism’s function or habitat, such as Lactobacillus, which combines the Latin word for milk (lac) with its rod shape, indicating its role in fermenting milk products. Disease associations also inspire names, as with Helicobacter pylori, which points to its spiral shape and its location near the pylorus valve of the stomach.
The scientific classification of bacteria is not static; names can and do change as scientific understanding deepens. Early bacteriologists had to rely on observable characteristics to group organisms. They used traits like cell shape (rod, sphere, or spiral), the results of staining procedures like the Gram stain, and metabolic capabilities, such as what the bacterium could consume for energy.
The advent of genetic sequencing technology has reshaped bacterial taxonomy. The analysis of the 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene has become a standard tool. This gene is present in all bacteria, and its sequence changes very slowly over evolutionary time, making it an excellent molecular clock for measuring relatedness. By comparing 16S rRNA sequences, scientists can construct more accurate evolutionary trees that map their genetic relationships.
This genetic data sometimes reveals that a bacterium was initially placed in the wrong group based on its physical traits alone. When such a discrepancy is discovered and confirmed, the scientific community acts to correct the classification. The bacterium is formally renamed and moved to a more appropriate genus that reflects its true evolutionary heritage.