How Many Animals Are Sentient? What the Science Says

Animal sentience, the capacity of animals to feel and experience subjective states like pain, pleasure, and emotion, is a growing area of scientific understanding. Recognition of animal sentience has gained significant traction, influencing discussions around animal welfare and ethical considerations towards other species. The scientific community continues to uncover the complexities of animal minds, revealing a deeper understanding of their inner lives.

What is Animal Sentience?

Animal sentience refers to the ability of animals to have subjective experiences, thoughts, feelings, and individual personalities. This concept is distinct from intelligence or consciousness, though all sentient beings are considered conscious to some degree. While consciousness can be broadly defined as awareness, sentience specifically denotes the capacity for positive and negative feelings or sensations.

In a biological context, the capacity to “feel” entails internal experiences and subjective states. This means there is “something it is like” to be that animal, experiencing its environment and internal sensations. Understanding sentience involves recognizing that animals possess their own preferences, desires, and needs. While the subjective nature of animal emotions can make them challenging to measure, scientific research has increasingly demonstrated that animals have complex emotional lives.

How Sentience is Measured

Scientists employ various approaches and criteria to assess sentience in animals, drawing insights from behavioral, physiological, and cognitive indicators. Behavioral responses provide observable evidence, such as an animal avoiding harmful stimuli or seeking out positive experiences. For instance, studies observe animals self-administering analgesics to alleviate pain, or engaging in play behavior and exhibiting signs of grief. These actions suggest an internal experience of discomfort or well-being.

Physiological responses offer further evidence by examining internal biological changes. Researchers measure stress hormones, analyze brain activity, and study neural networks. The presence of specific brain structures, like the developed neocortex or complex neural networks, and certain neurons, such as von Economo neurons found in great apes, elephants, and dolphins, are considered indicators of cognitive and emotional capabilities. The role of neurotransmitters like dopamine and serotonin in modulating emotional experiences across different species also provides insight.

Cognitive abilities, including learning, memory, problem-solving, and self-awareness, are also assessed. Tests like the mirror self-recognition test, where an animal recognizes its reflection as itself, indicate a level of self-awareness. Despite these methods, objectively measuring subjective experiences in animals remains challenging due to the lack of verbal reports and the inherent subjectivity of feelings. However, the scientific community continues to develop sophisticated means to understand and monitor animals’ emotional states.

Animals Exhibiting Sentience

Growing scientific evidence suggests that sentience is present across a wide array of animal groups. Mammals, including primates, elephants, dolphins, dogs, and livestock, show evidence of complex emotions, social cognition, and pain perception. For example, elephants exhibit emotional responses, including grief, and cetaceans like dolphins recognize themselves in mirrors, indicating self-awareness.

Birds, such as parrots, corvids, and chickens, also demonstrate significant cognitive abilities and emotional responses. Parrots and corvids are known for their problem-solving skills, while chickens exhibit complex social structures and even engage in play behavior. Scientific research indicates that birds experience emotions and can respond to stimuli in ways that suggest internal feeling states, despite their brain structures differing from mammals.

Increasing evidence points to sentience in fish, including species like salmon, carp, and trout. Studies indicate that fish perceive pain, exhibit fear responses, and engage in complex behaviors such as learning and memory. Their physiological reactions to noxious stimuli and behavioral changes consistent with pain avoidance contribute to the understanding of their capacity for negative experiences.

Cephalopods, including octopuses, squids, and cuttlefish, possess unique nervous systems and display complex problem-solving abilities. Research shows they can experience pain and distress, and exhibit sophisticated behaviors that suggest cognitive awareness. Their remarkable intelligence and capacity for learning further support their recognition as sentient beings.

The Cambridge Declaration on Consciousness

The Cambridge Declaration on Consciousness is a significant statement issued in 2012 by a prominent group of neuroscientists. This declaration formally acknowledged that non-human animals possess the neurological substrates necessary for consciousness and sentience, reflecting a growing scientific consensus. Scientists from various international institutions signed the declaration at the University of Cambridge, emphasizing that the absence of a neocortex does not preclude an organism from experiencing affective states.

A key conclusion of the Declaration is that all mammals, birds, and octopuses possess these neurological substrates. This means they have the brain structures and neural pathways that are considered capable of supporting conscious experiences, including the ability to feel emotions and sensations. The Declaration highlighted that the evidence for consciousness in these animals is substantial, drawing from neuroanatomical, neurochemical, and neurophysiological studies of non-human animals.

The Declaration’s significance lies in its role as an important statement from the scientific community. It moved the discussion from whether animals could be conscious to a more definitive affirmation, shaping subsequent research and ethical considerations. This consensus underscores the importance of acknowledging the inner lives of a broad range of species, reinforcing the scientific basis for animal welfare considerations.