How Is the Methuselah Star Older Than the Universe?

HD 140283, known colloquially as the Methuselah Star, is a celestial object that once presented a profound challenge to modern cosmology. Initial age estimates suggested it was older than the universe itself, creating a paradox that captured scientific attention. This ancient star is a subgiant located about 190 light-years away, making it bright enough for detailed study. Its remarkably low metal content identified it as a relic from the universe’s earliest epochs. The question of how a star could predate the cosmos forced astronomers to scrutinize both stellar dating methods and cosmological age models.

Establishing the Cosmic Timeline

The generally accepted age of the universe is approximately 13.8 billion years, derived from a comprehensive cosmological model. This age is fundamentally linked to the expansion rate of space, which is quantified by the Hubble Constant. By extrapolating the universe’s current expansion backward, scientists determine the moment when all matter must have been concentrated at a single point.

The most precise determination of this cosmic timeline comes from analyzing the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB), the faint radiation left over from the Big Bang. Data collected by missions like the European Space Agency’s Planck satellite mapped tiny temperature fluctuations in the CMB. These fluctuations provide crucial parameters for the Lambda-CDM model, which describes the universe’s composition and evolution.

The model uses these parameters—such as the density of normal matter, dark matter, and dark energy—to calculate the universe’s precise age. The final Planck results provided a highly constrained age of 13.787 billion years, with a margin of error of 0.020 billion years. This exceptionally small margin established a firm upper boundary against which the age of any stellar object must be compared.

How Scientists Estimate Stellar Age

Determining a star’s age relies heavily on stellar evolution models. A star’s lifespan is dictated by its mass and its initial chemical composition, or metallicity. More massive stars burn fuel faster and have shorter lives, while less massive stars, like HD 140283, survive for billions of years.

Scientists track a star’s progress by plotting its luminosity and surface temperature on a Hertzsprung-Russell diagram. When a star exhausts its core hydrogen fuel, it leaves the main sequence and swells into a subgiant. This phase allows astronomers to calculate its age by comparing its properties to theoretical evolutionary tracks.

The Methuselah Star’s subgiant status and low metallicity—its iron content is about 250 times less than the Sun’s—signify its antiquity. This low metallicity means it formed before subsequent generations of stars had enriched the galaxy with heavier elements.

Accurate age estimates require precise measurements of three fundamental properties: luminosity, surface temperature, and chemical abundances. Since distance measurement directly impacts calculated luminosity, even a small error in distance can drastically alter the final age estimate. Detailed spectroscopic analysis measures element ratios in the star’s atmosphere, which are fed into sophisticated computer models. Asteroseismology, which studies the star’s internal structure by analyzing its natural oscillations, is also used to provide tighter constraints on the star’s mass and age.

The Initial Measurement and the Age Paradox

The initial age estimates that sparked the cosmic paradox were based on early observational data, including measurements from the Hipparcos satellite around the year 2000. These calculations suggested an age for HD 140283 as old as 16 billion years. This figure was more than two billion years greater than the accepted age of the universe at the time.

This finding created an immediate conflict with the established cosmological framework. Since a star cannot logically be older than the universe, the discrepancy implied that either the stellar physics models or the cosmological models describing the universe’s age were flawed. The primary challenge in these initial studies was the difficulty in accurately determining the star’s distance from Earth.

A star’s luminosity is calculated from its apparent brightness and its distance. Therefore, an imprecise distance measurement leads to an incorrect luminosity, which introduces substantial error into the stellar evolution models used for age determination. Without a highly accurate parallax measurement, the initial age estimate was inflated, pushing its calculated lifespan past the cosmic boundary.

The Scientific Resolution: Refining the Error Margins

The resolution to the Methuselah Star paradox was achieved by reducing uncertainties in the star’s observed properties, particularly its distance. The Hubble Space Telescope was deployed to measure the star’s parallax—the tiny apparent shift in its position as the Earth orbits the Sun—with unprecedented accuracy. Using the telescope’s Fine Guidance Sensors, astronomers significantly reduced the error in the star’s distance, which lowered its calculated luminosity and estimated age.

This refined measurement led to a revised age estimate of 14.46 billion years, with an uncertainty range of 0.8 billion years. While the central value of 14.46 billion years still exceeded the universe’s age of 13.8 billion years, the large uncertainty range was the key to resolving the paradox. This error bar meant the star’s age was statistically constrained to fall between 13.66 billion and 15.26 billion years.

Since the lower end of the star’s age range (13.66 billion years) comfortably overlaps with the universe’s age (13.8 billion years), the star is no longer statistically older than the cosmos. Further analyses, including recent asteroseismology studies using data from the TESS mission, have refined the age to an even tighter estimate of 14.2 billion years, with an uncertainty of 0.4 billion years. This final, highly constrained age confirms the star’s status as one of the oldest known stars, formed within the first few hundred million years following the Big Bang, but definitively younger than the universe itself.