How Does Nuclear Fusion Differ From Nuclear Fission?

Nuclear energy is derived from changes within the core of an atom, known as the nucleus. Energy is released because the mass of the resulting particles is slightly less than the mass of the starting particles, with the difference being converted directly into energy. The two fundamental methods for harnessing this energy are nuclear fission and nuclear fusion. While both processes unlock energy from the atom, they are fundamentally opposite reactions involving different scales of matter and physical conditions.

The Mechanism of Nuclear Fission

Nuclear fission is the process of splitting a heavy atomic nucleus into two or more smaller nuclei. This reaction is typically induced by striking a large, unstable nucleus with a neutron. When the neutron is absorbed, it creates an unstable, excited compound nucleus.

This unstable nucleus immediately breaks apart, usually into two medium-sized fragments called fission products. The splitting is accompanied by the release of energy, primarily kinetic energy of the fragments and gamma radiation. Crucially, the process also releases two or three new neutrons.

These newly freed neutrons can then strike other heavy nuclei, causing them to split and release more neutrons. This multiplicative effect is known as a nuclear chain reaction, which allows for a continuous, self-sustaining release of energy in a reactor.

The Mechanism of Nuclear Fusion

Nuclear fusion is the reverse of fission, involving the combination of two light atomic nuclei to form a single, heavier nucleus. This is the process that powers the sun and all other active stars, where hydrogen atoms merge to form helium. To initiate this process on Earth, one must overcome the electrostatic repulsion between the positively charged nuclei.

Overcoming this repulsion requires particles to collide at high speeds, achieving temperatures of tens of millions of degrees Celsius. At these temperatures, the matter exists in a plasma state, a superheated gas where electrons are stripped from their nuclei. Once the nuclei are forced close enough, the strong nuclear force takes over, binding the nuclei and releasing energy.

The energy barrier required to achieve and sustain this reaction makes controlled fusion a scientific and engineering challenge. Fusion releases significantly greater energy per unit of mass than fission.

Contrasting Fuel Sources and Byproducts

The starting materials and final outputs of these two nuclear processes affect their long-term viability and environmental impact. Fission requires heavy, relatively scarce fuel sources, such as specific isotopes of uranium or plutonium. Preparing these materials is complex, and the global supply is finite.

Fusion, in contrast, uses light isotopes of hydrogen, which are abundant and easily obtained. One primary fusion fuel can be extracted from ordinary water, offering a limitless fuel supply.

Fission produces fission products, many of which are intensely radioactive and remain dangerous for hundreds of thousands of years, requiring secure, long-term storage. Fusion’s primary byproduct is inert, non-radioactive helium gas, which poses no environmental hazard.

While neutron bombardment in a fusion reactor can cause structural components to become radioactive, this material is typically lower-level waste that decays to safe levels much faster than high-level fission waste.

Current Applications and Energy Control

Nuclear fission is a mature technology deployed for commercial power generation and military applications since the mid-20th century. The challenge in a fission reactor is managing the chain reaction to prevent a runaway process. Control is achieved using neutron-absorbing control rods, which are inserted into the core to regulate the number of free neutrons available for splitting.

Fission reactors also employ a moderator, often water, to slow down neutrons so they are more likely to be absorbed by the fuel nuclei. In contrast, nuclear fusion remains largely experimental, focused on proving that a reaction can produce net energy.

The challenge for fusion is not preventing a runaway chain reaction, as fusion is inherently self-limiting; if precise conditions are not maintained, the reaction simply stops.

The technical hurdle is creating and sustaining the necessary plasma state, which involves containing the superheated, charged gas away from the reactor walls. This is primarily done using powerful magnetic fields in devices like tokamaks, which confine the plasma in a doughnut shape. Achieving sustained, net-positive energy output is the goal of current fusion research.