How Big Is Mount Everest? A Comparison for Scale

Mount Everest, known as Sagarmatha in Nepal and Chomolungma in Tibet, stands as the Earth’s highest peak on the border of Nepal and China. This geological giant is part of the Mahalangur Himal sub-range of the Himalayas. Its immense scale makes it a point of global fascination, but its true size is often difficult to grasp without context. To understand the mountain’s grandeur, its height must be placed into perspective through comparisons with other natural wonders and human achievements.

Establishing the Baseline Measurement

The definitive measurement of Mount Everest’s height is a complex issue influenced by geology and shifting snow. For decades, the accepted height was 8,848 meters, established by the Survey of India in 1954. However, in 2020, following a joint effort using advanced technology, Nepal and China officially announced a new, revised height. The internationally accepted elevation of Mount Everest is now 8,848.86 meters (29,031.7 feet) above sea level.

This measurement is taken from the summit’s snow and ice cap to the mean sea level, which is the standard for determining a mountain’s elevation. The measurement process is complicated because Everest sits on the collision point of the Indian and Eurasian tectonic plates, causing constant uplift. When comparing mountains, prominence is sometimes used, measuring the vertical distance between a peak and the lowest contour line connecting it to any higher peak. Since Everest is the highest mountain on Earth, its prominence is equal to its elevation above sea level.

Comparing Everest to Other Global Peaks

When comparing Everest to other mountains, its sheer elevation above sea level sets it apart. The world’s second-highest mountain, K2 (Mount Godwin-Austen), stands at 8,611 meters (28,251 feet). Everest surpasses its closest rival by approximately 237 meters, securing its position as the highest point on the planet. Both K2 and Everest belong to the group of 14 mountains that rise above 8,000 meters.

The perspective shifts significantly when considering the total height from the base to the summit. Mauna Kea, a dormant volcano in Hawaii, is often cited as the tallest mountain by this measure. While its summit is only 4,205 meters (13,796 feet) above sea level, its base rests deep on the Pacific Ocean floor. When measured from its underwater base to its peak, Mauna Kea reaches a total height of about 10,205 meters (33,481 feet), making it physically taller than Everest.

Comparing Everest to Man-Made Structures and Altitude

Mount Everest’s height can be better visualized by comparing it to familiar structures. The world’s tallest building, the Burj Khalifa in Dubai, reaches a height of 828 meters (2,717 feet). The summit of Everest is over ten times taller than the Burj Khalifa, illustrating the difference between human engineering and geological scale.

The summit also sits far above the typical cruising range for commercial airliners. Most large passenger jets fly at altitudes between 9,144 and 12,802 meters (30,000 to 42,000 feet). Everest’s peak is within the lower end of this flight ceiling. Furthermore, a large portion of the mountain is located within the “Death Zone,” the altitude above 8,000 meters (26,247 feet). In this zone, the atmospheric oxygen level is so low that the human body cannot survive for long without supplemental oxygen.

The Vertical Extremes: Scaling Everest Against the Ocean Depths

To frame Everest’s altitude within the context of global extremes, it is helpful to contrast it with the deepest known point on Earth. That point is the Challenger Deep, located at the southern end of the Mariana Trench in the western Pacific Ocean. The depth of the Challenger Deep is approximately 10,935 meters (35,876 feet) below sea level, resulting from the subduction of one tectonic plate beneath another.

The difference in elevation between Everest’s peak (8,848.86 meters above sea level) and the Challenger Deep (10,935 meters below sea level) represents a total vertical relief of nearly 20 kilometers. If Mount Everest were placed at the bottom of the Challenger Deep, its summit would still be submerged by more than two kilometers of water. This comparison illustrates the range of the Earth’s surface, from the highest terrestrial peak to the deepest oceanic abyss.