Can a Brief Resolved Unexplained Event (BRUE) Happen More Than Once?

A Brief Resolved Unexplained Event (BRUE) involves a sudden, unexpected change in an infant’s appearance or behavior that resolves quickly on its own. Occurring in an infant under one year of age, this event is a significant source of anxiety because it appears serious yet lacks a clear cause after initial assessment. Parents naturally wonder about the possibility of a second episode. This article explores the likelihood of recurrence and the steps medical professionals take to determine an infant’s risk profile following a BRUE. This information is for educational purposes and is not a substitute for professional medical advice.

Understanding the BRUE Diagnosis

The designation of a BRUE is a description of a specific, transient clinical event in a baby younger than one year old, not a diagnosis of an underlying disease. This modern term replaced the older phrase “Apparent Life-Threatening Event” (ALTE) in 2016 to reflect the event’s self-limited nature and remove the implication of a life-threatening episode. The diagnosis is one of exclusion, reached only after a thorough medical history and physical examination fail to identify an underlying cause.

The event must be brief, typically lasting less than one minute, and completely resolved before the infant receives medical attention. It must involve at least one of four key characteristics:

  • Cyanosis (blue or dusky color) or pallor (pale color).
  • Absent or irregular breathing.
  • A marked change in muscle tone (either stiff or floppy).
  • An altered level of responsiveness.

If a serious underlying issue like a seizure, infection, or cardiac problem is found after testing, the event is no longer classified as a BRUE.

Recurrence Probability and Risk Stratification

The core question for parents is whether a BRUE can happen again. Recurrence is generally uncommon, especially in infants classified as low-risk. Following a BRUE, all infants are stratified into either a low-risk or high-risk category, which determines the recurrence probability. The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) established specific criteria, and infants must meet all of them to be placed in the low-risk group.

Low-risk criteria include:

  • Being older than 60 days of age.
  • Having a gestational age of 32 weeks or more with a post-conceptional age of at least 45 weeks.
  • Having an event duration of less than one minute.
  • The event must be the infant’s first.
  • The event must not have required cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) by a trained medical professional.

Studies show that when all these criteria are met, the risk of a serious underlying diagnosis or a subsequent event is very low, estimated to be less than 1% to 4%.

An infant is classified as high-risk if they fail to meet even one of the low-risk criteria. For example, being younger than 60 days old, being born prematurely (less than 32 weeks gestation), or having a history of multiple events place a baby in the high-risk category. Recurrence is more probable in this group, requiring a more extensive diagnostic evaluation and observation period. This stratification prevents unnecessary testing in the majority of low-risk infants while focusing resources on those with an elevated chance of a repeat event or an occult underlying condition.

Essential Monitoring and Follow-Up Care

For infants deemed low-risk, follow-up care focuses on parental education and reassurance, alongside a prompt medical check-up. The AAP recommends a follow-up appointment with a primary care provider within 24 to 48 hours of discharge to ensure stability and support parents. The discharge plan includes teaching safe sleep practices and providing guidance on when to seek immediate medical attention.

For high-risk infants, monitoring and specialist consultation are more prominent parts of the care plan. Home cardiorespiratory or apnea monitors may be considered for high-risk infants to track breathing and heart rate patterns during sleep, though they are not universally recommended for all BRUEs. These devices do not replace vigilant parental observation. Parents of all infants diagnosed with BRUE are strongly encouraged to complete infant CPR training, which provides an actionable skill to reduce anxiety and allow effective response should a second event occur.

Long-Term Prognosis and Developmental Outcomes

Parents are naturally concerned about potential lasting effects on their child’s neurological development or future health following a BRUE. For the vast majority of infants, especially those in the low-risk category where a serious cause is ruled out, the long-term outlook is excellent. Studies tracking infants who experienced a BRUE show they do not have an increased rate of mortality or developmental delay compared to the general population.

The occurrence of a BRUE is not considered a precursor to Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS), a belief inaccurately associated with the former ALTE term. Provided a thorough evaluation does not uncover a serious, treatable underlying medical condition, the BRUE itself does not confer an increased risk of poor neurological or developmental issues. Rehospitalization rates are typically for common childhood illnesses, not for BRUE-related complications.