Are There Wolves in California? A Look at Their Return

Gray wolves are currently present in California, marking a significant return for a species absent from the state for nearly a century. These animals have migrated naturally from established populations in neighboring states, demonstrating the resilience of the species. The return of these apex predators is a developing story that spans the state’s history, conservation law, and active wildlife management.

The Historical Extirpation and Natural Return

Gray wolves historically roamed across much of California, with their presence documented in the Central Valley, the Sierra Nevada foothills, and the Coastal Ranges. With European settlement and the rise of the livestock industry in the 19th and early 20th centuries, a systematic campaign to eradicate predators began. Government-sponsored programs incentivized the killing of wolves, leading to the species’ complete extirpation from the state. The last confirmed wild wolf in California was killed in Lassen County in 1924.

The wolves’ return began decades later with the recovery of populations in the Northern Rocky Mountains, following federal protections and reintroduction efforts. As these populations expanded, wolves dispersed long distances in search of new territory and mates. This natural movement led to the arrival of OR-7, a male gray wolf from the Imnaha Pack in Oregon, who crossed the state line in December 2011. This event marked the first confirmed wild wolf in California since 1924 and served as the pivotal moment of re-establishment.

Current Distribution and Confirmed Packs

Following the initial arrival of solitary wolves like OR-7, California began to see the formation of resident packs. As of the most recent confirmed reporting, there are now ten known wolf packs established across Northern California.

Confirmed packs are established across Northern California, including:

  • The Whaleback Pack in Siskiyou County.
  • The Lassen Pack ranging across parts of Lassen and Plumas counties.
  • The Diamond and Harvey packs.
  • The Ice Cave Pack.
  • The Ashpan Pack in Shasta County.
  • The Ishi Pack in Tehama County.
  • The Tunnison Pack in central Lassen County.
  • The Beyem Seyo Pack in the Sierra County area.

Most significantly, the Yowlumni Pack was confirmed far to the south in Tulare County. This location is approximately 200 miles from the nearest known pack, demonstrating the species’ vast potential range within the state.

Biologists from the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) closely monitor these packs to track their movements and population dynamics. The primary tools for confirmation and tracking include the use of GPS tracking collars, which provide satellite-based location reports for collared individuals. Confirmation of uncollared wolves and new packs is often achieved through genetic analysis of scat and hair samples, alongside remote camera imagery.

Legal Protections and Management Framework

The status of the gray wolf in California is governed by both state and federal law, providing comprehensive protection against harm. In 2014, the California Fish and Game Commission listed the gray wolf as an Endangered species under the California Endangered Species Act (CESA). This listing, codified in the California Fish and Game Code, prohibits the “take,” or the hunting, pursuing, or killing, of the species without specific authorization.

At the federal level, the gray wolf in California is also protected as Endangered under the U.S. Endangered Species Act (ESA). Both federal and state agencies enforce these protections. The CDFW works under a cooperative agreement with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to manage the species’ conservation within California.

To guide the species’ recovery and address potential conflicts, the CDFW developed the Conservation Plan for Gray Wolves in California. This management framework outlines conservation goals, monitoring strategies, and methods for minimizing wolf-livestock conflicts, such as the use of non-lethal deterrents. The plan also anticipates the need for compensation mechanisms for ranchers who experience livestock losses due to confirmed wolf depredation.