Are Straitjackets Still Used in Modern Psychiatry?

A straitjacket is a specialized garment made from heavy canvas or a similar durable fabric, featuring long sleeves designed to restrict a person’s arm movements by binding them close to the body. The sleeves are crossed in front of the chest and secured behind the back, making it impossible for the wearer to use their hands freely. This device has become an enduring cultural symbol of mental health treatment, leading many to question its current application in professional healthcare settings.

The Historical Role of the Straitjacket

The straitjacket, sometimes called a camisole, emerged in the 18th century and saw widespread use in psychiatric asylums throughout the 19th and early 20th centuries. Before the development of modern psychotropic medications, staff had few options for managing patients experiencing extreme agitation, violence, or self-destructive behaviors. The device served as a means of continuous physical control for individuals who posed an immediate threat to themselves or others.

Historically, the straitjacket was considered a relatively humane alternative to the iron chains or ropes previously used to shackle patients. Its primary function was to immobilize the arms and torso without causing immediate physical injury, allowing staff to maintain order in understaffed institutions. However, this prolonged physical restraint often led to patient distress, circulation issues, and injury. Its use began to decline significantly following reform movements in the mid-20th century.

The Current Status of Straitjacket Use

The traditional canvas straitjacket is overwhelmingly obsolete and is not standard practice in modern, accredited medical or psychiatric facilities across developed nations. Its use has been largely discontinued due to ethical concerns, the risk of injury, and the development of safer, less restrictive alternatives. Healthcare guidelines and ethical standards now strictly prohibit the use of such a severe, non-releasable physical restraint.

The device is considered a relic of a past era of mental health treatment that prioritized confinement over therapeutic intervention. While it remains a popular trope in media and is occasionally seen in non-medical contexts, such as specialized transportation for high-risk individuals in correctional settings, these are not accepted psychiatric practices. Hospital facilities adhere to regulatory standards that have mandated the replacement of the straitjacket with modern, standardized protocols.

Modern Standardized Restraint Methods

The methods that have replaced the straitjacket are designed around the principle of using the “least restrictive means” necessary to ensure immediate safety. When a patient’s behavior escalates to a point of imminent danger, modern facilities employ a range of standardized interventions. These include physical restraints, chemical restraints, and environmental controls, all subject to rigorous safety standards.

Physical restraints today typically involve soft limb restraints, such as specialized nylon or Velcro straps, that secure a patient’s wrists and ankles to a bed or chair frame. This four-point restraint system is commercially manufactured for safety, allows for quick release, and requires constant, in-person monitoring by trained staff. The modern design prioritizes minimizing the risk of positional asphyxia or circulation problems, which were serious dangers with older restraints.

Chemical restraint involves the controlled use of fast-acting medication, often administered via injection, to rapidly sedate a patient and manage acute agitation. This method is only employed when verbal de-escalation and other non-pharmacological interventions have failed to mitigate the immediate danger. Environmental restraint, or seclusion, involves placing the patient alone in a locked, safe room for a brief period to reduce external stimuli and allow for self-calming.

Governing Rules for Patient Restraint

Any use of a restraint method in a healthcare facility is governed by strict, mandatory regulations established by bodies like the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) and The Joint Commission. These rules stipulate that restraint or seclusion may only be used as a last resort to ensure the immediate physical safety of the patient or others, not for staff convenience, punishment, or coercion. The application of any restraint must be immediately documented, and staff must continuously monitor the patient’s physical and psychological well-being.

One significant requirement is the need for a face-to-face evaluation by a physician or licensed independent practitioner within one hour of initiating a restraint. Furthermore, all restraint orders are time-limited, typically expiring after a maximum of four hours for adults. Orders cannot be renewed without a new assessment and order. These regulations enforce a rapid transition out of the restraint, reflecting the modern ethical shift toward minimizing the duration and severity of all restrictive interventions.