What Is fMRI Data and What Does It Show?
Understand what fMRI data reveals about brain function, exploring the process from raw signals to brain maps and the important nuances of their interpretation.
Understand what fMRI data reveals about brain function, exploring the process from raw signals to brain maps and the important nuances of their interpretation.
Functional magnetic resonance imaging, or fMRI, provides a way to observe brain function by measuring and mapping its activity noninvasively. Unlike a static MRI that shows structure, fMRI captures how the brain works over time. This allows researchers to see which parts of the brain become more active when a person performs a task, experiences an emotion, or is at rest. This information is used for basic research into healthy brain operation and for clinical applications, such as studying how function is altered by neurological or psychiatric disorders.
The process of acquiring fMRI data uses the same fundamental technology as a standard MRI scan, employing a powerful magnet, radio waves, and computer processing. An individual lies on a table that slides into a large, cylindrical scanner. The machine’s strong magnetic field aligns the hydrogen nuclei in the water molecules throughout the brain. The scanner then sends radio waves through the brain, which temporarily knock these aligned nuclei out of position, and as they realign, they release a detectable signal.
What makes fMRI distinct is its ability to track changes related to brain function by measuring the Blood-Oxygen-Level-Dependent (BOLD) signal. When a brain region becomes more active, its neurons consume more oxygen. In response, blood flow to that area increases, delivering a surplus of oxygen-rich blood. This change in blood oxygenation alters the magnetic properties of the blood, which in turn affects the magnetic signal detected by the scanner.
During a scan, a person might be asked to perform tasks like tapping their fingers, looking at images, or listening to sounds. These tasks are often performed in alternating blocks with periods of rest. The scanner is quite noisy, so participants are given earplugs for comfort. The process is designed to capture the brain in action, linking specific mental processes to the dynamic changes in blood flow that the BOLD signal represents.
The raw output from an fMRI scan is a dataset that represents brain activity over time. The fundamental unit of this data is the voxel, which is a three-dimensional pixel. Each voxel represents the signal intensity from a small, cube-shaped volume of brain tissue. A complete fMRI scan consists of a series of 3D images of the entire brain captured sequentially, resulting in a four-dimensional dataset: three spatial dimensions plus time.
For each voxel, the scanner records a time-series of signal intensity values. This series reflects the fluctuations in the BOLD signal in that specific brain location throughout the scan. When a brain area is engaged by a task, the time-series for the voxels in that region will show a pattern of rising and falling signal intensity that corresponds to the timing of the task. The raw data is a collection of these numerical values from thousands of voxels at hundreds of time points.
To make this data interpretable, it is processed into visual representations called statistical maps. These maps, seen as colorful “blobs” overlaid on a structural brain image, highlight the areas where the BOLD signal changed significantly in response to a task. The colors on these maps indicate the strength of the activity, showing researchers at a glance which parts of the brain were most involved.
Transforming raw fMRI signals into meaningful brain maps requires several analytical steps. The initial data is often noisy and contains artifacts that must be corrected. One step is motion correction, which adjusts for the small head movements a person makes during the scan. Since the analysis depends on tracking the signal from each voxel over time, even slight movements can corrupt the data.
After correcting for motion, other preprocessing techniques are applied to improve data quality. Spatial smoothing involves averaging the signal from a voxel with its neighbors, which can help reduce noise and increase the signal-to-noise ratio. Temporal filtering is used to remove irrelevant signal fluctuations, such as those caused by breathing or heart rate. These steps refine the BOLD signal, making it easier to detect task-related changes.
The core of fMRI analysis involves statistical methods to identify brain regions with activity that correlates with the experimental task. The analysis creates a model of the expected BOLD response and then searches the brain for voxels whose time-series matches this model. Statistical tests are performed for every voxel, and a process called thresholding is applied to determine which voxels show a statistically significant effect. These are the regions displayed as “active” on the final brain map.
By mapping brain activity, researchers can investigate the neural basis of various cognitive functions. Studies have used fMRI to identify the specific brain networks involved in language comprehension, memory formation, and the processing of emotions. It allows scientists to observe how different brain regions collaborate to support complex behaviors. It can also reveal how brain networks mature and change as we learn new skills or adapt to new environments.
In the clinical domain, fMRI data helps characterize how brain function is altered in conditions such as Alzheimer’s disease, schizophrenia, and depression. By comparing the brain activity of healthy individuals to those with these disorders, researchers can identify potential biomarkers for diagnosis and monitor the effects of treatments. For instance, fMRI can show how a drug affects brain circuits or how cognitive behavioral therapy might change the way the brain processes emotional information, helping to tailor interventions to individual patients.
Interpreting fMRI data requires understanding its limitations. fMRI measures changes in blood flow, not the activity of neurons directly. Although neural activity and blood flow are closely linked, they are not the same thing, and the precise relationship is still an area of research. This means that conclusions drawn from fMRI data are correlational and do not imply causation.
The data can be affected by various sources of noise, including scanner hardware, physiological processes like breathing, and subject movement. These factors can obscure the true BOLD signal, making it challenging to detect real effects. The complexity of brain function also poses a challenge, as a single brain region may be involved in many different mental processes, so attributing its activation to one specific function can be an oversimplification.
Statistical analysis of fMRI data also presents hurdles. Researchers perform tens of thousands of statistical tests—one for each voxel—which increases the risk of finding false positives by chance. This is known as the multiple comparisons problem. While methods exist to correct for it, they require careful application to ensure that the conclusions drawn are both reliable and valid.