Tools and Targets in Cancer: Macrophages’ Promising Role
Exploring macrophages' role in cancer treatment, this article examines strategies to harness and target these immune cells for improved therapeutic outcomes.
Exploring macrophages' role in cancer treatment, this article examines strategies to harness and target these immune cells for improved therapeutic outcomes.
Cancer treatment strategies are evolving beyond chemotherapy and radiation. The immune system, particularly macrophages, plays a crucial role in tumor progression and therapy. These immune cells can either support or suppress cancer growth depending on their interactions within the tumor environment, making them a compelling focus for therapeutic intervention.
Recent research highlights multiple ways to harness macrophages in cancer treatment, from engineering them for direct anti-tumor activity to reprogramming those that promote tumor survival. Effectively utilizing and targeting these cells could lead to more precise and durable therapies.
Macrophages within tumors display significant functional diversity, shaped by the biochemical and cellular landscape of the tumor microenvironment. Broadly classified as tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs), they exist along a spectrum of activation states. Their behavior is influenced by oxygen availability, cytokine signaling, and metabolic conditions, allowing them to either support tumor progression or contribute to anti-tumor immunity.
TAMs are often categorized as M1-like and M2-like macrophages. M1-like macrophages, induced by pro-inflammatory signals like interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) and lipopolysaccharide (LPS), exhibit tumoricidal properties by producing reactive oxygen species (ROS) and pro-inflammatory cytokines such as tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) and interleukin-12 (IL-12). These macrophages enhance antigen presentation and stimulate cytotoxic T-cell responses, contributing to tumor suppression. In contrast, M2-like macrophages, driven by signals like interleukin-4 (IL-4), interleukin-10 (IL-10), and transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-β), promote tissue remodeling, angiogenesis, and immune suppression. They facilitate tumor growth by secreting vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), enhancing blood vessel formation and extracellular matrix degradation.
The spatial distribution of macrophages within tumors further underscores their functional heterogeneity. Hypoxic regions, often in the tumor core, foster the accumulation of M2-like macrophages due to the stabilization of hypoxia-inducible factor-1 alpha (HIF-1α), which drives the expression of pro-angiogenic and immunosuppressive genes. Conversely, macrophages in the tumor periphery may retain more M1-like characteristics, particularly in tumors with active immune infiltration. This spatial variation suggests that macrophage function is dynamically regulated by local environmental conditions.
Single-cell RNA sequencing and multiplex imaging techniques reveal even greater complexity within TAM populations, identifying subsets that do not fit neatly into the M1/M2 paradigm. Some macrophages exhibit hybrid phenotypes, co-expressing markers associated with both inflammatory and immunosuppressive functions. Others display unique transcriptional signatures linked to metabolic adaptations, such as lipid metabolism or iron homeostasis, which influence their pro- or anti-tumor roles. These findings highlight the need for a more nuanced classification system that accounts for the full spectrum of macrophage states in tumors.
Macrophages can be leveraged in cancer therapy through strategies that enhance their tumor-fighting capabilities or modify their interactions within the tumor microenvironment. These approaches include engineering macrophages for direct anti-tumor activity, activating immune pathways, and utilizing them as vehicles for targeted drug delivery.
Genetic and cellular engineering techniques modify macrophages for enhanced anti-tumor activity. One approach introduces chimeric antigen receptors (CARs) into macrophages, similar to CAR-T cell therapy. CAR macrophages (CAR-Ms) are designed to recognize tumor-specific antigens, leading to direct phagocytosis of cancer cells. A 2020 study in Nature Biotechnology found that CAR-Ms targeting HER2-positive tumors effectively engulfed cancer cells and remodeled the tumor microenvironment to favor immune activation. Unlike CAR-T cells, which rely on cytotoxic mechanisms, CAR-Ms exert their effects through phagocytosis and cytokine secretion, making them particularly suited for solid tumors.
Another strategy involves modifying macrophages to resist immunosuppressive signals in tumors. For example, macrophages can be engineered to express dominant-negative receptors that block inhibitory cytokines like TGF-β, preventing their conversion into tumor-supportive phenotypes. CRISPR-based gene editing has also been explored to enhance macrophage persistence and function by knocking out genes that promote exhaustion or apoptosis. These modifications aim to create macrophages that maintain tumoricidal activity despite suppressive tumor conditions.
Macrophages can be stimulated through immune-modulating agents that enhance their ability to recognize and attack cancer cells. Toll-like receptor (TLR) agonists, which mimic microbial signals, activate macrophages. TLR7 and TLR9 agonists, for example, induce pro-inflammatory macrophage activation, leading to increased tumor cell phagocytosis and cytokine production. A Clinical Cancer Research (2021) trial reported that intratumoral administration of a TLR9 agonist led to macrophage-mediated tumor regression in patients with advanced melanoma.
Colony-stimulating factor 1 receptor (CSF1R) inhibitors modulate macrophage activity. While CSF1R blockade is often used to deplete tumor-promoting macrophages, lower doses can reprogram them toward a more inflammatory state. Additionally, checkpoint inhibitors targeting macrophage-expressed proteins such as CD47, which acts as a “don’t eat me” signal, enhance macrophage-mediated phagocytosis of cancer cells.
Macrophages’ natural ability to infiltrate tumors makes them effective carriers for targeted drug delivery. Researchers have explored loading macrophages with chemotherapeutic agents, nanoparticles, or gene therapy vectors to enhance drug accumulation in tumors while minimizing systemic toxicity. A 2022 study in Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews highlighted macrophage-based carriers delivering doxorubicin-loaded nanoparticles to glioblastoma, demonstrating improved drug penetration and prolonged tumor suppression.
Another strategy involves engineering macrophages to secrete therapeutic proteins directly within the tumor. For example, macrophages can be modified to produce tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL), which selectively induces apoptosis in cancer cells. This approach has been tested in preclinical models of pancreatic cancer, where TRAIL-secreting macrophages led to significant tumor reduction without harming normal tissues.
While macrophages can be harnessed for cancer therapy, tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) often contribute to tumor progression by promoting immune suppression, angiogenesis, and metastasis. Targeting these macrophages through depletion, reprogramming, or signal pathway modulation disrupts their tumor-supportive functions and enhances anti-cancer immunity.
One approach to eliminating tumor-promoting macrophages targets the colony-stimulating factor 1 receptor (CSF1R), a key regulator of macrophage survival. CSF1R inhibitors, such as pexidartinib, have been shown to reduce TAM populations in preclinical models of breast and pancreatic cancer, leading to decreased tumor growth.
Another strategy involves using bisphosphonates like zoledronic acid, which induce macrophage apoptosis. Liposomal clodronate formulations selectively deplete macrophages in tumors while sparing other immune cells. However, depletion strategies must be carefully balanced to avoid impairing beneficial macrophage functions, such as pathogen defense and tissue repair.
Rather than eliminating TAMs, reprogramming strategies shift their phenotype from an immunosuppressive state to a pro-inflammatory, tumoricidal one. Small-molecule inhibitors or cytokines, such as IFN-γ and TLR agonists, enhance macrophage-mediated tumor destruction.
Epigenetic modulators, such as histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors, alter gene expression patterns associated with immune suppression. A Nature Communications (2021) study demonstrated that HDAC inhibition restored macrophage-mediated anti-tumor immunity in glioblastoma models.
Targeting key signaling pathways that regulate macrophage function provides another approach to disrupting TAM-mediated tumor support. PI3Kγ inhibitors, such as IPI-549, shift macrophages toward a pro-inflammatory state, enhancing anti-tumor responses in combination with checkpoint inhibitors.
Blocking the CD47-SIRPα interaction, which prevents macrophages from recognizing cancer cells as foreign, has emerged as a promising strategy to enhance macrophage-mediated phagocytosis.
Integrating macrophage-targeted therapies with existing treatments enhances efficacy and overcomes resistance. Combining macrophage reprogramming agents with immune checkpoint inhibitors amplifies anti-tumor responses. A phase 1b trial evaluating the PI3Kγ inhibitor IPI-549 with nivolumab demonstrated improved responses in patients with advanced solid tumors.
Another strategy pairs macrophage-directed therapies with chemotherapy to counteract drug resistance. In pancreatic cancer, where TAMs contribute to chemoresistance, combining gemcitabine with macrophage-modulating agents has been investigated to improve drug efficacy.