The Control of Nature: Taming Rivers and Lava Flows

Humanity has long sought to manage and redirect natural forces, driven by a desire for safety and human benefit. This often leads to large-scale interventions in landscapes and ecosystems. Human interaction with powerful natural phenomena is marked by impressive engineering feats and ongoing challenges.

The Battle Against Water

Controlling water movement has been a longstanding human pursuit, exemplified by extensive engineering projects worldwide. A prominent example is the Mississippi River in the United States, where decades of effort have aimed to prevent its natural tendency to change course. As an alluvial river, the Mississippi seeks the shortest and steepest path to the Gulf of Mexico, increasingly through the Atchafalaya River. By the early 1950s, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers determined that without intervention, the Mississippi could divert its main flow to the Atchafalaya by 1990, threatening cities like Baton Rouge and New Orleans with reduced water flow.

To counteract this natural process, known as avulsion, the Old River Control Structure was completed in 1963 in central Louisiana, with additional structures added in 1986 after the 1973 Mississippi River Flood. This system of floodgates and dams regulates the flow, allowing approximately 30% of the Mississippi’s water to enter the Atchafalaya River while ensuring 70% remains in the current Mississippi channel. Different structures within the system manage routine flow and higher water levels to maintain this distribution.

Across the Atlantic, the Netherlands offers another extensive illustration of water management through its intricate system of dikes and polders. Much of the country lies below sea level, making it susceptible to flooding from the North Sea and major rivers. For centuries, the Dutch have constructed dikes, compacted soil embankments, to keep water out of low-lying areas and reclaim land. These reclaimed areas, known as polders, are hydrologically separated and require continuous pumping to remain dry.

Early polder management utilized windmills to power paddle wheels or Archimedes screws, lifting water over dikes to maintain dry canals and ditches. Modern systems have largely replaced these with steam, diesel, and electric pumping stations, evolving techniques while maintaining land reclamation and flood protection. Coastal defenses, such as seawalls, also represent direct human intervention against water. Built along shorelines, they protect properties from erosion, storm waves, and rising sea levels.

Taming the Solid Earth

Human efforts to manage geological forces are often reactive, focusing on protecting communities from immediate threats posed by the earth’s movements. One notable instance of directly confronting a geological hazard occurred during the 1973 eruption of Eldfell volcano on Heimaey, Iceland. The eruption produced lava flows that threatened to block the island’s harbor, which was essential to the local fishing economy.

To prevent the harbor’s closure, an operation commenced involving spraying seawater onto the advancing lava front. This cooling effort, which continued for months, aimed to solidify the molten rock prematurely, creating a barrier to redirect the flow. By solidifying the lava’s outer layers, the operation successfully slowed and diverted the flow, stopping it just short of sealing off the harbor entrance. The cooled lava even formed a new natural breakwater, improving the harbor’s protection.

On land, managing the hazards of catastrophic debris flows represents another form of taming the solid earth, particularly in mountainous regions susceptible to such events. In places like the San Gabriel Mountains of California, communities at the foothills face risks from fast-moving mixtures of mud, rocks, and vegetation. These flows are often triggered by heavy rains, especially after wildfires have stripped hillsides of stabilizing vegetation.

To mitigate this danger, a network of debris basins and check dams has been constructed at the mouths of canyons. These structures are designed to capture large volumes of sediment, gravel, boulders, and vegetative debris washed down during storms, preventing them from flowing downstream into populated areas and damaging infrastructure. For example, many debris basins collect significant amounts of material annually, requiring regular removal to maintain their capacity.

The Unintended Consequences of Command

While human interventions to control natural forces can offer immediate protection, they frequently lead to unforeseen and complex consequences. A notable phenomenon is the “levee effect,” where the perceived safety provided by flood protection structures encourages increased development and population growth in areas that remain at risk. This can lead to greater potential losses when these engineered systems are eventually overtopped or breached during extreme flood events, as people tend to underestimate the residual risk behind such barriers.

The extensive leveeing of the Mississippi River, designed to control its flow and prevent flooding, has significantly altered the river’s natural processes, leading to the sediment starvation of its delta. Historically, the river would regularly overflow its banks, depositing nutrient-rich sediments across its floodplain, which built and sustained the delta’s wetlands. Confining the river with levees has largely cut off this natural land-building process, causing sediment to be carried directly into the deep waters of the Gulf of Mexico instead of replenishing the marshes.

This disruption has led to significant land loss in coastal Louisiana. Without the regular influx of sediment, the delta naturally subsides, and the land sinks below sea level, making it more vulnerable to erosion and saltwater intrusion. The altered flow regimes and disconnection from floodplains also result in a loss of biodiversity, as varied habitats created by a naturally meandering river disappear, replaced by a more uniform channel. Such interventions often necessitate ever-larger and more costly measures to maintain an artificial equilibrium against natural forces.

Shifting Paradigms from Control to Collaboration

A contemporary approach to managing natural forces is emerging, moving beyond brute-force control towards a philosophy of collaboration and resilience. This shift acknowledges that complete domination of nature is often unsustainable and can lead to adverse outcomes. Instead, strategies now focus on working with natural processes to reduce risks and enhance ecological functions.

The “Room for the River” program in the Netherlands exemplifies this paradigm shift, departing from traditional reliance on dike reinforcement. This initiative aims to manage higher river water levels by strategically giving rivers more space to expand safely. Measures include lowering floodplains, relocating dikes further inland, creating water buffers, and constructing flood bypasses, all designed to increase the river’s discharge capacity without raising existing dike levels. This program enhances flood safety and improves the environmental quality and spatial planning of river regions.

Another strategy gaining traction is managed retreat, a coastal management approach that allows the shoreline to move inland rather than attempting to hold it fixed with engineered structures. This involves the planned relocation of people and infrastructure away from vulnerable coastal areas, especially in response to rising sea levels and erosion. As part of managed retreat, natural coastal habitats, such as wetlands and salt marshes, are often restored or enhanced seaward of new defense lines.

The restoration of natural wetlands serves as a buffer against storm surges and waves, absorbing energy and reducing their impact on inland communities. Studies indicate that wetlands can significantly reduce wave energy and height. This approach leverages the natural protective capabilities of ecosystems, representing a sustainable way of coexisting with the powerful forces of the sea.

What Are Pressure Cells in Biology and Weather?

Humans on Mars: The Scientific Challenges of Survival

Do Fish Poo? The Science of Aquatic Waste