Diabetes is a chronic condition affecting how the body converts food into energy. Food breaks down into glucose, which enters the bloodstream, signaling the pancreas to release insulin. Insulin helps glucose enter cells for energy. Diabetes occurs when the body doesn’t produce enough insulin or can’t use it effectively. This article explores how diabetes prevalence, risk factors, and impact differ between males and females.
Sex-Specific Prevalence
Globally, diabetes prevalence varies by sex, region, and age. Overall, it is slightly more common in males, with recent estimates showing 9.8% of men compared to 9.1% of women in the general adult population.
Prevalence patterns differ by type. Type 1 diabetes, an autoimmune condition, generally shows higher incidence in males before puberty, lessening later. For Type 2 diabetes, men often have higher diagnosis rates, especially in middle age. Gestational diabetes, developing during pregnancy, exclusively affects females and typically resolves after childbirth, increasing a woman’s later Type 2 diabetes risk.
Geographical location and socioeconomic factors also influence these patterns. Cultural practices or dietary norms can contribute to different risk profiles. Shifts in lifestyle and healthcare access have influenced trends, narrowing the gap in some areas while others maintain a male predominance.
Biological Influences on Diabetes Risk
Biological factors significantly influence diabetes susceptibility. Sex hormones influence glucose metabolism and fat distribution. Estrogen, more prominent in females, offers protective effects against insulin resistance, a precursor to Type 2 diabetes, by improving insulin sensitivity and promoting healthier fat storage.
Testosterone, more prevalent in males, contributes to a different metabolic profile. Higher testosterone levels, especially with other factors, may link to increased insulin resistance and more visceral fat. Visceral fat, stored around abdominal organs, is metabolically active and can impair insulin action. Females tend to store more subcutaneous fat, which is less metabolically harmful.
Genetic predispositions also differ by sex. Certain genes linked to diabetes risk may have varying expression or interact differently with environmental factors. Some genetic variants linked to impaired insulin secretion or increased insulin resistance may exert a stronger effect in one sex.
Lifestyle and Societal Influences
Beyond biological differences, lifestyle and societal factors shape diabetes risk. Dietary patterns often differ; men may consume more red meat and processed foods, while women might have higher intakes of fruits and vegetables, though cultural trends vary. Physical activity levels also diverge, with men sometimes engaging in more high-intensity activities, while women might face different exercise barriers.
Smoking and alcohol consumption patterns also show sex-specific trends. Historically, men had higher smoking rates, though female rates have increased, both contributing to diabetes risk. Heavy alcohol consumption, impacting glucose regulation, shows different patterns. Occupational exposures, such as prolonged sitting or chemical exposure, can disproportionately affect one sex, influencing metabolic health.
Healthcare-seeking behaviors also contribute to observed differences. Men are less likely to seek routine medical check-ups or preventative care than women, potentially delaying diagnosis. Public health campaigns may also resonate differently or be targeted more effectively towards one sex, impacting early detection and risk mitigation.
Differential Impact and Management
Diabetes can manifest with varying impacts and require distinct management approaches. Cardiovascular disease, a major complication, often presents differently; women with diabetes may experience a higher relative risk of heart disease than men. Kidney disease progression can also show sex-specific patterns, influenced by hormonal and lifestyle factors.
Sexual health issues are common, with erectile dysfunction affecting men, while women may experience reduced libido, vaginal dryness, or painful intercourse. Mental health implications, such as depression and anxiety, are prevalent and can manifest differently, with women often reporting higher rates.
Diagnosis can sometimes be delayed in women due to less typical symptom presentation or healthcare biases. Treatment strategies, including medication effectiveness, can also vary by sex. Certain oral medications or insulin regimens might have different efficacy or side effect profiles due to hormonal influences. Personalized management plans considering these sex-specific differences benefit diabetes care.
References
International Diabetes Federation. IDF Diabetes Atlas, 10th Edition. Brussels, Belgium: International Diabetes Federation; 2021.
Maahs DM, Westfall JM, Nallamothu A. Diagnosis and Management of Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus. Am Fam Physician. 2010;81(9):1107-1114.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Diabetes Statistics Report. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2020.
American Diabetes Association. 2. Classification and Diagnosis of Diabetes: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes—2021. Diabetes Care. 2021;44(Suppl 1):S15-S33.
Mauvais-Jarvis F. Estrogen and Androgen Regulation of Metabolism. Compr Physiol. 2018;8(4):1325-1351.
Varlamov O, et al. Sex Differences in Metabolic Regulation. Exp Biol Med (Maywood). 2016;241(12):1377-1392.
Karpe F, Pinnick KE. Biology of adipose tissue. Diabetologia. 2015;58(9):1993-2000.
Florez JC. The new type 2 diabetes genetics: toward an understanding of the disease not just risk. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2019;15(1):35-46.
Popkin BM, et al. Global nutrition transition and the double burden of disease in China and India. Obes Rev. 2011;12(5):309-322.
Hallal PC, et al. Global physical activity levels: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2012;380(9838):247-257.
Pan A, et al. The relationship of smoking and incident type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. Diabetologia. 2015;58(1):159-165.
Knott C, et al. Alcohol consumption and the risk of Type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of cohort studies. Diabetologia. 2015;58(11):2473-2486.
Wang Y, et al. Gender differences in health care seeking behavior among adults in rural China. PLoS One. 2014;9(11):e112771.
Huxley RR, et al. Type II diabetes and coronary heart disease: a meta-analysis of 102 prospective cohort studies. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2009;2(5):497-505.
Kovesdy CP. Epidemiology of chronic kidney disease: an update 2022. Kidney Int Suppl (2011). 2022;12(1):7-11.
Enzlin P, et al. Sexual dysfunction in women with diabetes: a systematic review. Diabetes Care. 2015;38(11):2150-2159.
Roy T, et al. Diabetes and depression: a systematic review of the literature. BMC Public Health. 2009;9:247.
Kautzky-Willer A, et al. Sex and Gender in Diabetes. Endocr Rev. 2016;37(3):278-316.