How Expensive Is Hydropower Compared to Other Energy?

Hydropower, also known as water power, is a method of generating electricity by harnessing the energy of moving water. It is a renewable energy source that converts the gravitational potential or kinetic energy of water into electrical power, primarily through the use of turbines and generators. Evaluating the cost of hydropower is important for understanding its overall feasibility and role in the global energy landscape.

Upfront Development Costs

Constructing a hydropower facility involves substantial initial capital expenditures. Building a dam, a primary component for many hydropower projects, can range from several million to tens of billions of dollars, depending on its scale and design. In the United States, the average construction cost for hydroelectric plants is around $5,200 per kilowatt (kW) of installed capacity, meaning a 100-megawatt project could exceed $500 million.

Civil works, which include powerhouses, tunnels, and penstocks, represent a significant portion of the total outlay, sometimes reaching up to 50% of the overall infrastructure costs. Machinery and equipment, such as turbines and generators, also contribute significantly to the initial investment, with larger setups involving equipment procurement exceeding $1 million.

Land acquisition, including the purchase of land and water rights, can add hundreds of thousands of dollars to the initial expenses, potentially ranging from $100,000 to $500,000 for some projects. Costs associated with environmental studies, permitting, and regulatory compliance are also incurred upfront, potentially reaching millions and taking years to finalize. Detailed feasibility studies alone can cost between $50,000 and $250,000, with regulatory compliance fees adding an estimated 2-3% to the total project cost.

Long-Term Operating Expenses

After the initial construction, hydropower facilities incur ongoing costs for operation and maintenance. These expenses include staffing, administrative overhead, and routine upkeep of equipment and structural components. Annual operational expenses for hydropower plants typically range from 1.5% to 2.5% of the investment costs per year, or 3-5% of the asset’s capital value over its lifespan.

Maintenance involves regular inspections, repairs, and upgrades to ensure the facility’s efficiency and longevity. Unlike fossil fuel power plants, hydropower facilities do not require fuel, which eliminates a significant ongoing cost. This absence of fuel expenses makes its operational costs generally lower and more predictable compared to thermal power generation.

Key Drivers of Hydropower Expense

The cost of hydropower projects varies considerably due to several influencing factors.

  • Project size and capacity: Smaller hydropower plants typically have higher specific investment costs ranging from $2,000 to $7,500 per kilowatt, compared to larger plants. Larger projects generally benefit from economies of scale, leading to lower costs per unit of energy produced over their lifespan.
  • Geographical location: Factors like geology, remoteness, and accessibility impact expenses. Constructing facilities in remote areas or on challenging terrain can increase site preparation, material transport, and labor costs.
  • Type of facility: Impoundment (dam-based) projects are common for large-scale generation; run-of-river plants often have a smaller environmental footprint but less on-demand power. Pumped-storage hydropower, designed for energy storage, can have investment costs up to twice that of traditional un-pumped systems.
  • Environmental regulations: Mitigation measures contribute to project costs, varying widely depending on the specific site and regulatory requirements. These include costs for fish and wildlife protection, water quality monitoring, and recreation. Smaller plants or those undergoing relicensing may face proportionately higher environmental mitigation costs.
  • Financing costs: Influenced by interest rates and the project’s duration, these affect economic viability, as hydropower projects often have long development lead times.

Comparing Hydropower’s Cost

When comparing hydropower to other energy sources, the Levelized Cost of Energy (LCOE) provides a comprehensive metric that includes both initial capital and long-term operational costs over a project’s lifetime. The unsubsidized LCOE for recently constructed hydropower plants has ranged from $30 to $180 per megawatt-hour, with a median around $110 per megawatt-hour, making it competitive with other forms of energy generation.

Hydropower’s initial construction costs are often higher than other technologies. In 2016, hydropower had the highest average construction cost per kilowatt in the U.S. at $5,312, compared to solar at $2,434 and natural gas at $895. This high upfront investment is offset by the absence of fuel costs, a key advantage over fossil fuel plants.

Compared to solar and wind, which have seen consistent cost declines, hydropower’s capital intensity can seem significant. While nuclear energy has generally increased in cost, hydropower’s long operational lifespan provides a distinct economic advantage. Facilities can operate for 50 years or more, some lasting over a century. This longevity, combined with minimal ongoing fuel expenses, often makes hydropower competitive over its entire life despite substantial initial investment.