Cell and Flare: Key Drivers Behind Intraocular Inflammation
Explore the underlying mechanisms of intraocular inflammation, the role of aqueous humour, and clinical approaches to identifying cell and flare.
Explore the underlying mechanisms of intraocular inflammation, the role of aqueous humour, and clinical approaches to identifying cell and flare.
Inflammation inside the eye can cause significant discomfort and vision problems. A key indicator of intraocular inflammation is “cell and flare,” terms describing inflammatory cells and protein leakage in the aqueous humour. Identifying these signs is crucial for diagnosing and managing ocular conditions.
To understand this better, we examine the aqueous humour’s role, inflammatory mechanisms, diagnostic techniques, and related eye disorders.
The aqueous humour maintains the physiological stability of the anterior chamber and intraocular dynamics. Produced by the ciliary body, this transparent fluid circulates from the posterior chamber through the pupil into the anterior chamber. It delivers nutrients and oxygen to avascular structures like the cornea and lens while removing metabolic waste. Its production and drainage through the trabecular meshwork and uveoscleral outflow pathways help regulate intraocular pressure (IOP), which, if disrupted, can contribute to disease.
Beyond nourishing the eye, the aqueous humour facilitates biochemical signaling. It contains proteins, electrolytes, and growth factors that regulate cellular interactions and maintain homeostasis. The blood-aqueous barrier, formed by tight junctions in the ciliary epithelium and iris vasculature, selectively controls which molecules enter from systemic circulation. Disrupting this barrier allows plasma proteins and immune cells to infiltrate, leading to increased protein content and cellular infiltration—manifesting as “flare” and “cell.”
Normally, the aqueous humour remains optically clear, allowing unobstructed light passage to the retina. When inflammation alters its composition, increased protein concentration scatters light, producing the Tyndall effect observed during slit-lamp examination. This disruption serves as a measurable indicator of intraocular inflammation.
A compromised blood-aqueous barrier triggers a cascade of inflammatory events. When endothelial tight junctions in the iris vasculature and ciliary epithelium lose integrity, plasma proteins and immune cells infiltrate the aqueous humour. Albumin, globulins, and fibrinogen increase protein concentration, reducing optical transparency. This protein influx, particularly albumin, causes “flare” by scattering light during slit-lamp examination.
The “cell” component results from leukocytes migrating into the anterior chamber. Vascular adhesion molecules like intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1) and vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM-1) facilitate immune cell extravasation. In acute inflammation, neutrophils predominate due to their rapid response, while chronic conditions involve more lymphocytes and macrophages. Granulomatous inflammation presents with epithelioid histiocytes and multinucleated giant cells, whereas non-granulomatous inflammation primarily features mononuclear cells.
Inflammatory mediators further alter the anterior chamber’s biochemical environment. Cytokines such as interleukin-6 (IL-6), tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), and interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) contribute to endothelial dysfunction, worsening blood-aqueous barrier compromise. Increased prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) synthesis heightens vascular permeability, exacerbating protein leakage and triggering secondary effects like miosis, pain, and photophobia.
Slit-lamp biomicroscopy is the gold standard for detecting cell and flare. A narrow beam of light illuminates the aqueous humour, allowing visualization of inflammatory cells and protein content. Adjusting beam width and intensity enhances contrast, while the Tyndall effect reveals increased flare as a hazy appearance. Leukocytes appear as floating white dots against the illuminated chamber’s dark background.
Grading scales quantify severity, standardizing assessment. The Standardization of Uveitis Nomenclature (SUN) working group established a widely used system, categorizing cell count per high-power field from 0 (no cells) to 4+ (over 50 cells per field). Flare intensity follows a similar scale, ranging from none (optically clear fluid) to severe (marked haze obscuring intraocular structures). These classifications help monitor disease progression and treatment response.
Laser flare photometry offers objective aqueous humour protein measurements, reducing interobserver variability. This non-invasive technique quantifies light scattering intensity, correlating directly with protein concentration. It is particularly useful for detecting subclinical inflammation, especially in chronic uveitis where flare may persist despite clinical improvement. Unlike subjective assessment, laser flare photometry provides precise numerical values, enhancing diagnostic accuracy and enabling standardized comparisons across patient populations.
Uveitis frequently presents with cell and flare, indicating inflammation of the uveal tract. Anterior uveitis, the most common form, leads to significant inflammatory cell accumulation in the aqueous humour, causing ocular pain, photophobia, and redness. Flare severity often correlates with disease activity, making its assessment essential for diagnosis and treatment monitoring. Persistent flare, even without active inflammation, can indicate long-term blood-aqueous barrier damage, potentially leading to complications like posterior synechiae or secondary glaucoma.
Lens-induced inflammation, including phacoanaphylactic and phacolytic uveitis, also contributes to cell and flare. These conditions occur when lens proteins leak into the anterior chamber due to trauma or cataractous degeneration, triggering inflammation. Phacolytic uveitis, in particular, involves high-molecular-weight lens proteins provoking an exaggerated response, leading to elevated intraocular pressure and dense cellular accumulation. Flare presence helps distinguish these conditions from other forms of uveitis, guiding appropriate surgical intervention.
Post-surgical inflammation following cataract extraction or intraocular lens implantation can temporarily increase cell and flare. While mild postoperative inflammation is expected, persistent or excessive flare may indicate complications such as toxic anterior segment syndrome (TASS) or low-grade endophthalmitis. Differentiating these conditions is critical—TASS typically manifests within 24 hours as sterile inflammation, while infectious endophthalmitis develops more gradually and requires immediate antimicrobial treatment. Flare severity often correlates with clinical severity, making its evaluation essential for postoperative monitoring.