Pathology and Diseases

Can You Die From Granulosa Cell Tumor? Key Prognostic Insights

Understand the prognosis of granulosa cell tumors, including key factors influencing outcomes, recurrence risks, and the impact of rare aggressive variants.

Granulosa cell tumors (GCTs) are a rare type of ovarian cancer that arise from sex cord-stromal cells. While generally slow-growing with a favorable prognosis, their potential for recurrence and, in some cases, aggressive behavior makes understanding their impact on survival crucial.

Assessing the likelihood of death from GCT depends on factors such as tumor stage, histological features, and treatment response.

Biological Features

GCTs originate from ovarian sex cord-stromal cells, which are involved in hormone production and follicular development. These tumors secrete estrogen, leading to endocrine-related manifestations. Histologically, they consist of small, uniform cells arranged in distinctive patterns, such as Call-Exner bodies—microfollicular structures filled with eosinophilic material. These formations help differentiate GCTs from other ovarian malignancies. Unlike epithelial ovarian cancers, which spread via peritoneal dissemination, GCTs tend to grow locally and have a propensity for late recurrence rather than widespread metastasis.

Molecularly, GCTs are frequently associated with the FOXL2 c.402C>G (p.C134W) mutation, present in about 97% of adult-type cases. This mutation disrupts granulosa cell differentiation and proliferation, driving tumorigenesis. The FOXL2 gene encodes a transcription factor essential for ovarian follicle development, and its mutation leads to dysregulated signaling that promotes tumor survival. This genetic alteration is a reliable diagnostic marker, distinguishing GCTs from other ovarian neoplasms. Additionally, aberrant expression of TGF-β superfamily members, including inhibins and activins, influences tumor growth and hormonal activity.

The biological behavior of GCTs is dictated by mitotic activity, nuclear atypia, and tumor size. While most cases progress slowly, some exhibit increased proliferative potential, leading to aggressive courses. Their indolent nature often results in delayed detection, as they can remain asymptomatic for long periods. Despite a generally favorable prognosis, GCTs have a well-documented tendency for late recurrence, sometimes decades after treatment. This prolonged latency period is attributed to the tumor’s ability to remain dormant before reactivating under certain conditions.

Clinical Signs And Symptoms

GCTs often present with symptoms driven by estrogen secretion. One of the most common signs in premenopausal individuals is abnormal uterine bleeding due to continuous estrogen stimulation of the endometrium, which can lead to hyperplasia or, in some cases, endometrial carcinoma. Postmenopausal individuals may experience unexpected vaginal bleeding, prompting gynecological evaluation. Some patients report breast tenderness due to hormonal fluctuations.

Beyond gynecological symptoms, GCTs can cause abdominal discomfort due to their tendency to grow as solid masses. Patients frequently report pelvic pain, bloating, or a sensation of fullness, particularly when the tumor exerts pressure on surrounding structures. Larger tumors may lead to increased abdominal girth, often mistaken for weight gain or benign ovarian cysts. In rare cases, tumor rupture can cause acute abdominal pain and hemoperitoneum, requiring immediate intervention. Although ascites is uncommon compared to epithelial ovarian cancers, it may develop in cases with extensive peritoneal involvement.

Hormonal activity in GCTs can also lead to virilizing effects, though more commonly in juvenile-type cases. Symptoms such as hirsutism, voice deepening, and clitoromegaly arise from androgen production in some tumors. Conversely, excessive estrogen exposure in younger patients can cause precocious puberty, leading to early breast development and irregular menstruation. These endocrine disturbances make clinical presentation variable depending on age and tumor activity.

Diagnostic Tools

Detecting GCTs requires imaging, biochemical markers, and histopathological evaluation. Since symptoms are often nonspecific, initial detection frequently occurs during routine pelvic exams or imaging for unrelated concerns. Transvaginal ultrasound is the first-line imaging modality, revealing a solid or multilocular cystic ovarian mass with internal septations or hemorrhagic components. Unlike epithelial ovarian cancers, which often exhibit widespread peritoneal involvement, GCTs typically appear as well-circumscribed lesions confined to the ovary. Doppler ultrasound can help assess increased vascularity, suggesting neoplastic growth.

MRI and CT scans provide detailed tumor characterization and assess potential local extension. MRI, particularly with diffusion-weighted imaging, differentiates between benign and malignant ovarian masses based on cellular density and stromal composition. CT imaging evaluates lymph node involvement and distant spread, though metastases are rare in GCTs.

Serum biomarkers refine diagnosis, with inhibin B and anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) being particularly useful. These markers, secreted by granulosa cells, are often elevated in affected individuals. Inhibin B levels correlate with tumor burden and serve as reliable indicators for both diagnosis and post-treatment monitoring.

Histopathological examination confirms GCTs through microscopic evaluation of characteristic features such as Call-Exner bodies and nuclear grooves. Immunohistochemical staining enhances accuracy by detecting FOXL2, which is mutated in nearly all adult-type GCTs. Additional markers, such as SF-1 and WT1, help differentiate GCTs from other sex cord-stromal tumors.

Staging

GCTs are staged using the FIGO system, which evaluates tumor spread and informs prognosis. Most cases are diagnosed at Stage I, where the tumor remains confined to one or both ovaries. Further classification considers factors such as tumor rupture or malignant cells in peritoneal washings, which can slightly alter recurrence risk. Given their localized growth, early-stage detection is common, contributing to favorable outcomes.

Stage II involves tumor extension to pelvic structures such as the uterus, fallopian tubes, or peritoneal surfaces. This stage is relatively uncommon, as GCTs do not typically exhibit aggressive invasion patterns seen in epithelial ovarian cancers. Stage III includes dissemination beyond the pelvis, such as to the omentum or peritoneal surfaces, with possible nodal involvement. While lymphatic spread is rare, it can influence management. Stage IV, the most advanced category, is defined by distant metastases, such as pleural effusion with malignant cells or involvement of the liver and lungs. While uncommon, cases reaching this stage often require multimodal treatment strategies.

Prognostic Factors

The prognosis of GCTs is influenced by tumor stage at diagnosis, with Stage I cases generally having excellent long-term survival rates exceeding 90%. In contrast, advanced-stage cases exhibit a more unpredictable course, with higher recurrence rates. Tumor size also plays a role, as larger tumors, particularly those exceeding 10 cm, are more likely to rupture or invade surrounding tissues, increasing recurrence risk.

Histopathological features refine prognosis, with high mitotic activity and marked nuclear atypia indicating more aggressive behavior. Surgical outcomes significantly impact survival, as complete tumor resection improves long-term prognosis. Patients undergoing optimal cytoreductive surgery, where all visible disease is removed, have better recurrence-free intervals. Post-surgical monitoring of serum biomarkers such as inhibin B and AMH provides additional prognostic insights, as persistently elevated levels may indicate residual disease or impending recurrence.

Recurrence Potential

Despite their indolent nature, GCTs have a well-documented tendency for late recurrence, sometimes occurring decades after initial treatment. Unlike epithelial ovarian cancers, which frequently recur within a few years, GCTs can remain dormant for extended periods. The median time to recurrence varies widely, with intervals ranging from five to 20 years. This necessitates prolonged surveillance, as patients remain at risk long after initial diagnosis. Recurrences are often detected through rising serum inhibin B levels or imaging studies prompted by new symptoms.

When recurrence occurs, it is typically locoregional, affecting the pelvis, peritoneum, or retroperitoneal lymph nodes. However, distant metastases, though rare, have been documented in the liver, lungs, and bones. Management depends on tumor burden, with surgical resection preferred whenever feasible. Secondary cytoreductive surgery has been associated with prolonged survival in select cases, particularly when complete resection is achievable. For patients with unresectable or widespread recurrence, systemic therapies, including hormonal agents and chemotherapy, may be considered, though response rates vary.

Rare Aggressive Variants

While most GCTs follow a slow-growing course, rare histological subtypes exhibit more aggressive behavior. One such variant is juvenile-type GCT, which, though more common in younger individuals, can grow rapidly with a higher mitotic index. These tumors are often diagnosed earlier due to pronounced endocrine effects, such as precocious puberty, yet carry an increased recurrence risk if not completely excised.

Another aggressive form is poorly differentiated or high-grade GCT, characterized by significant nuclear atypia and a high proliferative index. These tumors may lack the classic Call-Exner bodies, making histological diagnosis more challenging. Patients with high-grade variants often experience shorter disease-free intervals and may require aggressive treatment, including adjuvant chemotherapy. Given the unpredictable nature of these rare subtypes, close postoperative monitoring with serial biomarker assessments and imaging is essential to detect early recurrence.

Previous

Danicopan FDA Approval: A New Option for Factor D Inhibition

Back to Pathology and Diseases
Next

Givinostat FDA Approval: A Potential Neuromuscular Breakthrough